Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-11
Subject: Re: Battery save app
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 10:01:53 +0000
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <lvmfgrF17heU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <vlrc1u$7c1$1@dont-email.me> <lucrcaF98g3U1@mid.individual.net> <vlrfgf$7c2$2@dont-email.me> <vlrkvg$5i8t$1@dont-email.me> <vls0b8$7c1$4@dont-email.me> <vn4tmt$3jtl0$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net XyhN+M6FkR/pgAnk9fJNIwJaCStWWjOpVwKBIeu3b7JAqda7NN
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+a72x0DFuk4lCmhK60ggzBq+uO8= sha256:2FPiB+tqZBMM6LSZRBaBwTp5oCf68qjuLoonKjGDgZA=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <vn4tmt$3jtl0$1@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com alt.comp.os.windows-11:16534

Daniel70 wrote:

> Wasn't there a problem with NiCad (I think) Batteries where 'they' 
> developed a memory so. if you always discharged them to say 60%, they 
> would remember this value and, once they reached that level they would 
> act like they were flat?

Yes, but that was only one of the reasons NiCd fell out of favour in 
most uses.