Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Frank Slootweg Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10 Subject: Re: E-S Date: 11 Jan 2025 16:38:56 GMT Organization: NOYB Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <9455ojhhtsvdgnnjdcb27afs5uk2sj43hj@4ax.com> X-Trace: individual.net IXq9x0qnG4rwgM0jRwwHiAtmVTFNWGj5Fyarek3SbuTQVN4yak X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:RbYxjlYVzP3vPbCGBAEa6GHQ5Sk= sha256:CPvSKoV/H77JxkRc1Y8Kk1RmIYqKx3XWqc5gqVB5gGg= User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2 Xref: csiph.com alt.comp.os.windows-10:181272 Ken Blake wrote: > On 10 Jan 2025 19:08:56 GMT, Frank Slootweg > wrote: > > > Isn't the Internet, etc. supposed to die first, because of all the > >Unix servers going down, on January 19, 2038!? :-) And the *next* > >disaster in 2486! > > I don't know and I don't care. I won't be alive in 1938 or 2486. Well, my mum lived to 102, so if you manage that, you'll be looking *back* on 2038. And what about your (grand)kids, if any? Anyway, as the smiley indicates, it's a joke, and, like with Y2K, it's no so much the systems, but the software/programs/applications/ running *on* those systems, which are the problem. BTW, your '1938' typo was quite funny, in this context! -- Frank Slootweg, did Unix (HP-UX) support before, during and after Y2K.