Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Fokke Nauta Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10 Subject: Re: Alternative for remote desktop connection Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 09:01:55 +0200 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net AKg0oIwXEO3/bNVYuxbqugDIrUONZIA3Rbb4SFE8cqUtDZHLi2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:9vV4n0Pbftd8Yp09j2j1+/U94Es= sha256:6jL4Ul3gZ7PgRVVGz7bqafVGGV0f5KWrMx7olMFnNVY= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Content-Language: nl In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com alt.comp.os.windows-10:186552 On 04/08/2025 11:50, Philip Herlihy wrote: > In article , fnauta@solfon.nl says... > > >> I have configured UltraVNC, that wasn't difficult. But it still didn't work. >> So I uninstalled UltraVNC. I now use TightVNC for the two local pc's. >> > > > All I can say is that I've installed UltraVNC on numerous machines over > many years and never had any problems with it. It may perhaps be that > it's not as clear how to set it up successfully as it might be? > > -- > Phil, London It wasn't difficult to set it up. But it did not work for the two wifi laptops. Fokke