Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Andy Burns Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.comp.os.windows-10 Subject: Re: Mechanical or SSD for backup drive Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 06:58:52 +0100 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <5cm80k1qavurb3keb805p5msgsbaimh7qt@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 3dK8V7eAsuuh47qi7OoujQdhdqrKKLitRy7OipR1S9pJ7V8Z7A Cancel-Lock: sha1:pEnCNtW9zC5w+sDswpVdt6M7IDU= sha256:faUFmM36U22UImCPJQx/cExB1LZwVRz+/Oh7rdWCioI= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com alt.comp.os.windows-11:18586 alt.comp.os.windows-10:183878 Paul wrote: > While SAS exists and could in principle be put in your > home computer, I've yet to read an account where someone > claims they got a good result by doing this. The previous motherboard in my "server" had a single PCI-X slot (pre PCIe but wider and faster than PCI). I bought a cheapish 6 port SAS controller and used it with linux software RAID. I won't even try to find whatever performance tests I did years ago, but I remember it favourably, and couldn't find a newer motherboard with PCI-X