Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.guns,alt.checkmate Subject: Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 20:19:37 -0700 Lines: 41 Message-ID: References: <2ef0d415-ec91-4536-9483-54677a43a873@googlegroups.com> <1274428934567726606.289811ted-sam.street@news.alt.net> <5pBVD.148661$mU.115517@fx02.iad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net tEQQn7quIHO0KM0bekPO7AK9woKplM4fHpizyprgcimac20lJu Cancel-Lock: sha1:eCWMJnCFBaBsprq//wuRWyP4Zvs= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 In-Reply-To: <5pBVD.148661$mU.115517@fx02.iad> Content-Language: en-US Xref: csiph.com alt.atheism:2571326 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:2109678 talk.politics.guns:1151172 alt.checkmate:242728 On 12/28/18 7:58 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 12/28/2018 7:04 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/28/18 6:57 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 12/28/2018 3:50 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>> ... you have an extremist group that benefits from gun deaths >>>> pretty much writing our gun laws. >>> >>> When you write stuff like that, which you KNOW you can't support >>> with evidence, you should abandon any pretense of wanting evidence. >> >> What makes you think it could not be supported? It is trivial to: >> >> https://www.businessinsider.com/nra-power-lobbying-statistics-gun-control-2017-10 >> > > The NRA isn't an extremist group. Cite. > The NRA doesn't benefit from gun deaths. Cite. > The NRA isn't writing our gun laws. They are heavily influencing the writing of them. > It's increasingly obvious that you have a pro-gun control agenda, > and that you reject evidence that contradicts your preconceptions. I back evidence based laws. You fear them. So be it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.