Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: vallor Newsgroups: alt.checkmate Subject: Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Date: 10 Jun 2018 07:04:41 GMT Lines: 102 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net UJwqImhWQXsEHOepBg/UOgAQYUbmbWP1idmgxJ/qlvDk+DzVJF Cancel-Lock: sha1:ERa52ibDhgGETLXD6GLM3tyNDUg= X-Face: #IeFY=iD)&ZN!<}=Q`7Ox_$c8FW)GFXwE@nuP?M%wgfLyX13'FP4j1lhl|*X9$|ka|:VM%EV5aL IhyA]r*'0FkZBcmzB2j"(kd[{ Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUNBAM7EQpyRybcYiaZgEX Yci7PdEm/fTWphDjJr3RGdiBkAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAAuIwAALiMBeKU/dgAAAZxJREFUOMt10LFu2zAQBuCTYLQrbTQCurlGXKBrCGp2Cg7M2BKM1zZG8gRVqa4BAbFr4UF9296dRVly6d+2zLuPRxoGzTnqlAd+aw3nxkMCrf9O4DIwO+p4DSgmcAnD0ekmo4M5mtBHnIg64IdeOgZcUnQAbSIOx4Dr0Iej7nFHDCYCeViZQN+GHq8rbMQBgFq/1wsqdiUfxhB3t8wl8/sJhMIQ0MR9aaYA73AvwWfWM+xgsxGwuN0A9FPA3SmfYuxiP0L8M/QXnW+700Qbo2+jv+d+2Xvvsca/xJ/StTsCw21qJPDxlQa6VCL8GlY/CPwEUlq6Ogde5IDOWwO8zYLIAeanmF/eNPjce7c/wZ672AM3hH9u4Z3bc9mM0HwlaFLpRnCPBM85EKW4Aotr8GYNWYDqex5E9eUSrLPKKnHz+P8EUk2wnYCivlXqDrY8Ya2UVjmQSnJsDQcltlI6yyXIlDnIGdTraizPcFcc5HW4yUBdHNS36tnNoX5aAggQxXL5MoVawDmrwwhP0z7A8uMLQ/0BLlNUCJk+nfcP8ChYuRQgrjoAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Pan/0.146 (Hic habitat felicitas; 1de4962 git.gnome.org/pan2) Xref: csiph.com alt.checkmate:172914 On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 23:51:11 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article , > vallor@cultnix.org says... > > > >> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 20:33:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >> > On 6/9/18 5:21 PM, vallor wrote: >> >> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:57:14 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 6/9/18 4:47 PM, vallor wrote: >> >>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:42:04 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> On 6/9/18 4:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> >>>>>> On 6/9/2018 4:34 PM, Snit wrote: >> >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> >>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 3:32 PM, Snit wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 12:42 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 9:50 AM, Snit wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> max headroom wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ignore the Supreme Court's analysis of the >> >>>>>>>>>>>> history in the Miller decision and the Heller decision, >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the 1982 report of the Subcommittee on the >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution to the Senate Judiciary Committee? >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I have talked in some depth about the judicial activism >> >>>>>>>>>>> shown in 2008. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Humor to try to hide your lack of counter. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Your lack of humor leads you to miss the counter. >> >>>>>>>> To be more plain, "judicial activism" does not mean what you >> >>>>>>>> seem to think it means.  Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller >> >>>>>>>> was not a case of judicial activism. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Bottom line: you prefer to push humor and insults and not the >> >>>>>>> controversial judicial activism of that 2008 decision. As far >> >>>>>>> as the meaning, I am talking about the redefining of the second >> >>>>>>> amendment by the Judicial branch >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Heller didn't do that. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I have shown the evidence to the contrary. >> >>>>> >> >>>>>>> and not the Legislative branch. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> The legislative branch does not have power to redefine the >> >>>>>> Second Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Fair enough.. the states do that. The judicial branch, though, >> >>>>> sure as hell should not be writing laws. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> You're a regular Perry Mason, aren't ya? >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law >> >>>> >> >>> This was not based on past precedence nor even the meaning of the >> >>> words used... sorta my point. >> >> >> >> Nice evasion. >> >> >> >> You wrote: >> >> >> >> "The judicial branch, though, sure as hell should not be writing >> >> laws." >> >> >> >> Do you wish to review and modify your statements for the record? >> >> >> >> Or...will you be moving to a country that isn't based on English >> >> common law? >> >> >> >> Or...? >> >> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT4wkkkaFTc >> >> >> > The legislative branch writes laws. The judicial branch interprets >> > the law. >> >> >> So you still don't understand English Common Law, and it is impossible >> to teach you anything about it. >> >> "Fair enough." > > I've come to the conclusion that you can't teach anybody on Usenet a > damned thing, because they already know it all. Skeeter taught me that. -- -v tpg and cola snecked.