Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #29735
| From | Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Exact integer-valued floats |
| Date | 2012-09-22 11:19 +0100 |
| Message-Id | <pan.2012.09.22.10.19.32.821000@nowhere.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| References | <505ca3e9$0$29981$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <7xzk4j6mmq.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> |
| Organization | Zen Internet |
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:23:41 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote: > Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> writes: >> Have I got this right? Is there a way to work out the gap between one >> float and the next? > > Yes, 53-bit mantissa as people have mentioned. That tells you what ints > can be exactly represented. But, arithmetic in some situations can have a > 1-ulp error. So I wonder if it's possible that if n is large enough, you > might have something like n+1==n even if the integers n and n+1 have > distinct floating point representations. Not for IEEE-754. Or for any sane implementation, for that matter. OTOH, you can potentially get n != n due to the use of extended precision for intermediate results. For IEEE-754, addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, remainder and square root are "exact" in the sense that the result is as if the arithmetic had been performed with an infinite number of bits then rounded afterwards. For round-to-nearest, the result will be the closest representable value to the exact value. Transcendental functions suffer from the "table-maker's dilemma", and the result will be one of the two closest representable values to the exact value, but not necessarily *the* closest.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Exact integer-valued floats Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-21 17:29 +0000
Re: Exact integer-valued floats Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-09-21 12:13 -0600
Re: Exact integer-valued floats Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2012-09-21 22:47 +0300
Re: Exact integer-valued floats Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-09-21 20:59 +0100
Re: Exact integer-valued floats Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-09-21 16:26 -0400
Re: Exact integer-valued floats Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2012-09-21 23:04 +0200
Re: Exact integer-valued floats Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-09-21 20:54 -0400
Re: Exact integer-valued floats Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-09-21 21:14 +0000
Re: Exact integer-valued floats Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-21 15:23 -0700
Re: Exact integer-valued floats Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-22 01:36 +0000
Re: Exact integer-valued floats Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-09-22 01:01 -0400
Re: Exact integer-valued floats Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2012-09-22 14:05 -0700
Re: Exact integer-valued floats Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-22 19:06 -0400
Re: Exact integer-valued floats Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2012-09-23 09:45 +0200
Re: Exact integer-valued floats wrw@mac.com - 2012-09-24 11:29 -0400
Re: Exact integer-valued floats Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-09-22 11:19 +0100
csiph-web