Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #411388
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. |
| Date | 2017-04-25 18:12 +0100 |
| Organization | ~ |
| Message-ID | <op.yy9gqcn4js98qf@red.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <140420171535216230%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan> <D516B55E.9F113%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yyut1zjgjs98qf@red.lan> <D51A69C1.9FFA5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 20:46:57 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/17/17, 12:35 PM, in article op.yyut1zjgjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 01:20:30 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/14/17, 1:30 PM, in article op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> But there is also a large cult-like following of it which is just >>>>>>> bizarre. >>>>>>> They push that you are not a "pure" user then you are not a "real" >>>>>>> user... >>>>>>> I >>>>>>> use macOS, Windows, and Linux and think they all have pros and cons and >>>>>>> people should use what they like and what fits their needs and resources. >>>>>>> You know, like with any other tool. To them this makes me a Linux "hater" >>>>>>> and someone who is not a "real" Linux user. And the fact I turn in bug >>>>>>> reports and speak of them means I note the weaknesses of desktop Linux >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> that just is unacceptable to them. The fact I do the same for software on >>>>>>> other platforms is not relevant in their minds. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sometimes annoying but overall just interesting to watch. >>>>>> >>>>>> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top? >>>>> >>>>> fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more. >>>> >>>> It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use. But you can't say >>>> anything is more advanced than linux. >>> >>> For me -- and most people -- what matters is how well you can get tasks >>> done. On Linux there are few tasks which the GENERAL user would do which are >>> handled better. >>> >>> For user who spend most of their time on the command line Linux is second to >>> none. And, of course, you cannot beat the price. >> >> Yes you can. MacOS installs for free on a hackintosh (PC built of hardware >> the MacOS can handle). And Windows up to version 7 has pirate free versions. >> 8 aswell I think, although I've never tried it. > > OK, you can fiddle and tinker and hope that you can get an illegal solution > to work... and wonder what update will kill it. Or you can just install > Linux. > > I think in those cases Linux tends to be the better choice. But if you > disagree so be it. There's no fiddling and tinkering involved. Basically you just make sure you use the same motherboard etc that Apple have used in one of their machines. -- Why isn't there mouse-flavored cat food?
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 18:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 11:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 20:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 12:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-25 21:38 +0100
csiph-web