Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #133791
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| References | <nnd$183177d6$36b3681c@f0aabdece3e0eb21> <5b871bb3d8bc9fc9ba75933f1b5e2580@www.novabbs.com> <nnd$0299ed2e$167a8a25@c01352f2405cb8ca> <3b926bd8baed1eddde7f2cd0feecf0a2@www.novabbs.com> |
| From | albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl |
| Subject | Re: docker, what could be the advantage? |
| Message-ID | <nnd$1cc59b22$1f6ef16a@fa384eb8eaee39fa> (permalink) |
| Organization | KPN B.V. |
| Date | 2025-06-20 20:53 +0200 |
In article <3b926bd8baed1eddde7f2cd0feecf0a2@www.novabbs.com>,
LIT <zbigniew2011@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I realised that you run one of my programs, fetched from
>>
>> https://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst/figforth.html
>>
>> You post to the world and you expect every Chinese to
>> understand what you are talking about?
>
>No, I post to the thread and I expect its creator _maybe_
>will understand that. But maybe not, from what I see.
>
>> It is better that you provide context, and also sign your
>> messages, if need be with a pseudonum.
>
>Do you really believe, that if someone in the
>Internet uses the name 'John Doe' - or, say,
>'Paul Johnson' - then really his name is John Doe
>(or Paul Johnson)? Because it looks more 'human-like'?
>
>I never make any assumptions like that.
That is not the question. I want to associate all your posts
together, and possibly put you in my kill file.
comp lang forth is a serious bunch. Do you really think that
professor Anton Ertl is not real? And that his webpage at
Technische Universitaet Wien is some sort of fake?
Most of us using real names.
>
>>> Maybe it does require some special configuration, anything?
>> How would you expect a 32 bit Forth to work under MSDOS?
>> Of course it needs a special configuration.
>> This is explained in README.TXT. How could you have guessed?
>
>Well in README.TXT there is just 'pointer'
>to quite basic config.sys recommended, like this:
>
>device=himem.sys
>DOS=HIGH
>
>Of course my config-s use that all the time
>(among other settings). Do you mean some other
>settings may interfere? The abobe seems not
>to be enough - that's why I posted my question.
>
>Anyway I tried it again using such spartan
>config.sys - and with no autoexec.bat at all
>- and it's still not going to work.
>DOS 6.22, 386SX 25 Mhz
README.TXT:
"For 32 bits Forth under MS-DOS adding config.sys is required."
Required? That is not a "pointer".
This is how your post should look like:
"
I have tried to run your wonderful program xx from your
wonderful website https:yy.
I successfully unpacked it and now I try to run it.
I diligently read the README.TXT
and accordingly I did everything it said.
Unfortunately it didn't work out.
INSERT
<Copy of command line dialog >
I'm at Witt's end. Please help me.
Regards, figForthlover.
"
Groetjes Albert
--
The Chinese government is satisfied with its military superiority over USA.
The next 5 year plan has as primary goal to advance life expectancy
over 80 years, like Western Europe.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
docker, what could be the advantage? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-16 14:19 +0200
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2025-06-16 16:18 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? minforth@gmx.net (minforth) - 2025-06-16 16:59 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-16 19:27 +0200
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-16 17:40 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-18 19:55 +0200
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2025-06-16 18:00 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-16 20:48 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2025-06-18 17:00 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-18 19:28 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2025-06-18 21:04 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-19 12:41 +1000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-19 12:36 +1000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2025-06-19 07:19 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-20 02:02 +1000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-18 13:25 +0200
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-20 10:46 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? minforth@gmx.net (minforth) - 2025-06-20 12:05 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-20 14:45 +0200
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-20 13:09 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-20 20:53 +0200
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-20 19:21 +0000
csiph-web