Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14697
| From | Mike Gerwitz <mtg@gnu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Segfault on recursive trap/kill |
| Date | 2018-10-07 13:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1808.1538933157.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <874ldy1vka.fsf@gnu.org> <8736tj3llu.fsf@gnu.org> <25389056-9fcf-1d31-36d8-13098769a43a@case.edu> <18119.1538880121@jinx.noi.kre.to> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 09:42:01 +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > I expect that if you did look, you'd probably find that while > technically the former, it isn't a reference to some wild pointer, > but rather simply growing the stack until the OS says "no more" > and returns a SIGSEGV instead af allocating a new stack page. That makes sense. Thanks. Though, it is an implementation detail that IMO a user of bash shouldn't have to worry about---if bash instead implemented its interpreter stack on the heap rather than the same stack as bash itself, a segfault could have represented an actual bug. -- Mike Gerwitz
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Segfault on recursive trap/kill Mike Gerwitz <mtg@gnu.org> - 2018-10-07 13:24 -0400
csiph-web