Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #76152
| References | <d6e2ab63-c9bc-4271-abac-17e32afa4c88@googlegroups.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2014-08-12 15:31 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.12901.1407879145.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:02 AM, cool-RR <ram.rachum@gmail.com> wrote: > And that's it, no coroutines, no `yield from`. Since, if I understand correctly, asyncio requires a mainloop, it would make sense for the AsyncIOExecutor to have a thread of its own in which it could run its mainloop. I think that putting the event loop in a separate thread would be necessary if the intention is that the executor be invoked from outside. I'm not aware of this work having been done, but it sounds perfectly feasible.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface cool-RR <ram.rachum@gmail.com> - 2014-08-12 10:02 -0700
Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-12 21:31 +0300
Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-08-12 19:43 +0100
Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-08-12 15:31 -0600
Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-13 08:03 +0300
Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-08-13 00:03 -0600
csiph-web