Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #76152

Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface

References <d6e2ab63-c9bc-4271-abac-17e32afa4c88@googlegroups.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date 2014-08-12 15:31 -0600
Subject Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.12901.1407879145.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:02 AM, cool-RR <ram.rachum@gmail.com> wrote:
> And that's it, no coroutines, no `yield from`. Since, if I understand correctly, asyncio requires a mainloop, it would make sense for the AsyncIOExecutor to have a thread of its own in which it could run its mainloop.

I think that putting the event loop in a separate thread would be
necessary if the intention is that the executor be invoked from
outside. I'm not aware of this work having been done, but it sounds
perfectly feasible.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface cool-RR <ram.rachum@gmail.com> - 2014-08-12 10:02 -0700
  Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-12 21:31 +0300
  Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-08-12 19:43 +0100
  Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-08-12 15:31 -0600
    Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-13 08:03 +0300
      Re: Using asyncio workers in a `concurrent.futures` interface Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-08-13 00:03 -0600

csiph-web