Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #76108
| References | <lsb3g4$p0s$3@reader1.panix.com> <CAMZYqRRH2a0MYGJCKv8Y9W97jr5o4CoF4hRg5Bg1DvgM9wqWDA@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-08-12 12:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Linux distros w/o Python in "base" installation |
| From | Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.12883.1407837630.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: > I just installed Arch Linux for the first time, and was surprosed to > find that Python isn't installed as part of a "base" system. It's > also not included in the 'base-devel' package group. It's trivial to > install, but I'd still pretty surprised it's not there by default. I > guess I've spent too much time with Gentoo, Debian, and RedHat > derivitives which require Python be installed. > > I've probably used at least a dozen Linux distros over the years, and > this is the first time I've noticed that Python wasn't installed by > default. Arch has a different idea of “base system”. The base group contains the most crucial packages needed to run an Arch Linux system, and that is all. And you do not need Python to do so. Nevertheless, most people will likely install Python by themselves, or with a package that depends on Python. On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> wrote: > It would seem that such distros are opting to not be LSB-compliant?: > http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/LSB_4.1.0/LSB-Languages/LSB-Languages/pylocation.html Arch does not really care about LSB, AFAIK. -- Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick <http://chriswarrick.com/> PGP: 5EAAEA16 stop html mail | always bottom-post | only UTF-8 makes sense
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linux distros w/o Python in "base" installation Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-08-11 18:53 +0000
Re: Linux distros w/o Python in "base" installation Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2014-08-11 12:02 -0700
Re: Linux distros w/o Python in "base" installation Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-08-11 20:13 +0000
Re: Linux distros w/o Python in "base" installation Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2014-08-11 14:36 -0700
Re: Linux distros w/o Python in "base" installation Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-12 09:35 +1000
Re: Linux distros w/o Python in "base" installation Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-08-12 02:33 +0000
Re: Linux distros w/o Python in "base" installation Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2014-08-12 00:18 -0700
Re: Linux distros w/o Python in "base" installation David Palao <dpalao.python@gmail.com> - 2014-08-12 09:59 +0200
Re: Linux distros w/o Python in "base" installation Fabien <fabien.maussion@gmail.com> - 2014-08-12 11:53 +0200
Re: Linux distros w/o Python in "base" installation Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-08-11 21:36 -0700
Re: Linux distros w/o Python in "base" installation Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> - 2014-08-12 12:00 +0200
Re: Linux distros w/o Python in "base" installation Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-08-12 14:12 +0000
Re: Linux distros w/o Python in "base" installation Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-08-12 09:49 -0600
csiph-web