Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #74595
| References | <CABTXsnfPZtBy+s7HjoOk2S6QbqHF1ObRNY3fvqMOOixzRVucKA@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Maxime Steisel <maximesteisel@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2014-07-17 01:09 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Anything better than asyncio.as_completed() and asyncio.wait() to manage execution of large amount of tasks? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.11904.1405552164.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
2014-07-15 14:20 GMT+02:00 Valery Khamenya <khamenya@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> both asyncio.as_completed() and asyncio.wait() work with lists only. No
> generators are accepted. Are there anything similar to those functions that
> pulls Tasks/Futures/coroutines one-by-one and processes them in a limited
> task pool?
Something like this (adapted from as_completed) should do the work:
import asyncio
from concurrent import futures
def parallelize(tasks, *, loop=None, max_workers=5, timeout=None):
loop = loop if loop is not None else asyncio.get_event_loop()
workers = []
pending = set()
done = asyncio.Queue(maxsize=max_workers)
exhausted = False
@asyncio.coroutine
def _worker():
nonlocal exhausted
while not exhausted:
try:
t = next(tasks)
pending.add(t)
yield from t
yield from done.put(t)
pending.remove(t)
except StopIteration:
exhausted = True
def _on_timeout():
for f in workers:
f.cancel()
workers.clear()
#Wake up _wait_for_one()
done.put_nowait(None)
@asyncio.coroutine
def _wait_for_one():
f = yield from done.get()
if f is None:
raise futures.TimeoutError()
return f.result()
workers = [asyncio.async(_worker()) for i in range(max_workers)]
if workers and timeout is not None:
timeout_handle = loop.call_later(timeout, _on_timeout)
while not exhausted or pending or not done.empty():
yield _wait_for_one()
timeout_handle.cancel()
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Anything better than asyncio.as_completed() and asyncio.wait() to manage execution of large amount of tasks? Maxime Steisel <maximesteisel@gmail.com> - 2014-07-17 01:09 +0200 Re: Anything better than asyncio.as_completed() and asyncio.wait() to manage execution of large amount of tasks? CHIN Dihedral <dihedral88888@gmail.com> - 2014-07-22 09:20 -0700
csiph-web