Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #601013

Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/7/2023 11:59 AM, patdolan wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 2:29:47 AM UTC-8, whodat wrote:
>> On 2/7/2023 12:08 AM, patdolan wrote:
>>> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 8:01:47 PM UTC-8, whodat wrote:
>>>> On 2/6/2023 8:58 PM, patdolan wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 6:23:03 PM UTC-8, whodat wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/6/2023 7:34 PM, Volney wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/6/2023 3:57 PM, patdolan wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 6:58:13 AM UTC-8, seto...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 4:32:45 PM UTC-5, Pentcho Valev wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is no asymmetry dilation of absolute time.. What this mean is
>>>>>>>>> that a clock second (clock time) contains a different amount of
>>>>>>>>> absolute time is differet frames.
>>>>>>>>> On earth a clock second is representedy 9,192,3631,770 transitions of
>>>>>>>>> the Cs 133 atom. Up at the GPS a clock second is represented by
>>>>>>>>> 9,192,631,774.1617 transitions of Cs 133 atom. These two different
>>>>>>>>> definitions represent the same amount of absolute time but at
>>>>>>>>> different locations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am aghast that Pentcho's unmasking of Einstein's illogical gaff has
>>>>>>>> not generated more views/comments in this forum.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can we get a three way kꚙkfight going?? A kꙫꙫk threesome?
>>>>>> No such luck. Dolan doesn't believe a word of what he says.
>>>>> Out-effing-rageous !
>>>> Whazzat, that you're so transparent?
>>> Ha!! You reveal yourself whodatMAKER. Only the Starmaker would concatenate the letters W. h. a. z. z. a. t.
>> Not Starmaker, you idiot. I'm old enough that whazzat is coming back
>> into vogue again. My mother couldn't understand why "roaring 20's"
>> parties were becoming popular during my college days because she had
>> lived and partied through the original ones and thought them boring.
>>
>> But then you're desperate to find something, anything, about the
>> mystery I purposely evoke using my moniker. I use this moniker to
>> avoid exposing my real name that I used last time I was in the
>> sci.physics newsgroups. Too bad if you're having a tough time
>> dealing with it,
>>
>> BTW, Starmaker is extremely shallow "back of the classroom cutup kid"
>> who may be enjoying himself but definitely isn't contributing anything
>> to these newsgroups lacking *any* knowledge about the legitimate topics
>> discussed here. He's not even a crank because he doesn't know enough on
>> topic. He is every bit as much an idiot and fool as you are.
>>
>> But go ahead and keep clutching at straws if that's what trips your
>> trigger. I know who I am and that isn't anyone you know. The only one
>> around long enough to know me is Moroney, and I think he's given up
>> trying to figure me out. Just as well because I like him as the
>> knowledgeable poster he is, so rare these days. I'm sorry to see him
>> dropping off these days but then his mission seems to be posting less
>> than in the past.
>>
>> I know that doesn't clear anything up for you but then I don't really
>> care about that.
> Moroney is now Volrony or something.  He's so damned dumb he can't keep straight the difference between a standing wave an traveling EM wave.
> 
> You've pigeon-holed yourself with Volroney, oh foolish truedat.

I guess everything is all right for you so long as you're having fun.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-04 13:32 -0800
  Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-05 05:01 -0800
    Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-05 19:33 -0800
  Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Estaban Alduino <tosd@teabnnai.ou> - 2023-02-06 01:48 +0000
  Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 06:58 -0800
    Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 12:57 -0800
      Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 18:11 -0600
        Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 17:28 -0800
          Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 20:21 -0600
      Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-06 20:34 -0500
        Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 20:22 -0600
          Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 18:58 -0800
            Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 22:01 -0600
              Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 22:08 -0800
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 04:29 -0600
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-07 09:59 -0800
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 13:23 -0600
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-07 14:37 -0500
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-10 22:16 +0000
  Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 19:20 -0800

csiph-web