Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #576154
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-06 16:35 -0800 |
| References | <I_HMLUBsBFTOy4Rrxl4zBsLw6uk@jntp> <9387b3b2-05bc-4e16-9e39-913ef8780e97n@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <ef794eec-ca8a-4fbd-b967-ef067bd2f73dn@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Invariance of the speed of light |
| From | "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> |
On Sunday, February 6, 2022 at 2:12:43 PM UTC-8, Ross A. Finlayson wrote: > On Sunday, February 6, 2022 at 6:47:36 AM UTC-8, Richard Hachel wrote: > > Invariance of the speed of light. > > > > The speed of light is invariant by change of frame. > > > > This is something that has been difficult to teach. > > > > But the ordeal is not over. Ol must also teach that it is for all > > repositories, including accelerated repositories. > > > > And there, it's no pie. > > > > However, it is obvious that if I move at accelerated speed towards a wagon > > where a ray of light falls, this ray is observed only in relation to an > > infinitesimal succession of Galilean reference frames. > > > > The speed of light will always be the same. > > > > The spoke will take on the appearance of a curve. But on this curve the > > speed of light will be constant and equal to c. > > > > Another thing: all the repositories are fixed for themselves. This is true > > for Galilean repositories, but it is also true for accelerated > > repositories. A falling body does not move relative to itself. For him, it > > is the earth that approaches him at accelerated speed. > > > > This idea is very useful to understand what happens when describing the > > traveler of Tau Ceti. > > > > The rocket is fixed, its propulsion acts as if propelling the surrounding > > space at accelerated speed. > > > > Hence the extraordinary simplicity of calculation that can be done (in two > > lines) when we have understood all that and we see the error of > > relativistic physicists when they deal with the proper time of this > > rocket. > > > > We then understand (and it makes us laugh so much we feel stupid not to > > have thought of it) why the time of the rocket between the moment it takes > > off and the moment when the Tau Teri system joins it, is same, absolutely > > of the same value as the instant when another rocket would take off (but > > at adequate average speed) and the instant when the Tau Ceti system would > > join it. > > > > The departure of the two rockets being simultaneous, the arrival of the > > two rockets being simultaneous. > > > > Whatever happens between the two, since neither, in its frame of > > reference, has moved, and joint events (they leave the earth together and > > Tau Ceri joins them when they are together) undoubtedly remain joint. > > The proper times of the two rockets will therefore be the same in both > > cases. > > It is therefore sufficient to know the proper time of one of the rockets > > to have the proper time of the other. It will be the same. > > > > > > T.H. > Sagnac / Ehrenfest. > > 1/2 c wheel + 1/2 c wheel = 1 c wheel Pezzaglia's usually reliable. http://www.clifford.org/wpezzag/talk/2005eugene/05eugene.pdf Not to mention authoritative.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Invariance of the speed of light Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-02-06 14:47 +0000
Re: Invariance of the speed of light Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-06 08:05 -0800
Re: Invariance of the speed of light whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-02-06 12:33 -0600
Problem Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-02-06 18:59 +0000
Re: Problem The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-06 12:22 -0800
Re: Problem Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-02-06 20:35 +0000
Re: Problem FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2022-02-06 16:10 -0500
Re: Problem The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-06 21:01 -0800
Re: Problem The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-02-06 21:02 -0800
Re: Invariance of the speed of light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-02-06 14:12 -0800
Re: Invariance of the speed of light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-02-06 16:35 -0800
Re: Invariance of the speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-02-07 06:23 +0100
Re: Invariance of the speed of light Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-02-07 15:14 +0000
Re: Invariance of the speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-02-13 19:14 +0100
Re: Invariance of the speed of light Darrel Angus <argus@iiehdc.mx> - 2022-02-14 07:11 +0000
Re: Invariance of the speed of light Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-02-13 23:54 -0800
Re: Invariance of the speed of light Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-02-14 21:51 +1100
csiph-web