Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.misc > #2910
| Subject | Re: Protected PDF Files |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.acorn.misc |
| From | Richard Porter <dontusethis@address.uk.invalid> |
| Date | 2011-12-12 23:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <adcca84052.news@user.minijem.plus.com> (permalink) |
| References | <523de26065see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> <m2hb1c8msz.fsf@unknown-00-23-6c-8d-9e-26.lan> <79bae83d52.martin@bach.planiverse.com> <523dec6217see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> <a23bf03d52.martin@bach.planiverse.com> |
| Organization | Mini Marcos Owners Club |
The date being 7 Dec 2011, Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> decided to write: > The conceptual problem is that certain types of printing (PostScript) > are effectively equivalent to exporting the file in an editable > format, so the very common flag combination "Printing: yes, Editing: > no" cannot really be enforced. My car insurance company has taken to sending me documentation by email as a "protected" PDF file, which includes forms that I need to complete or modify and return. Printing is allowed, because obviously they expected the forms to be printed and returned by post. I did the PostScript trick, edited the relevant pages in !Draw and sent them back in a PDF file. They didn't query it. -- Richard Porter rich@ / www. richardporter.me.uk "You can't have Windows without pains."
Back to comp.sys.acorn.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Protected PDF Files Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2011-12-07 14:07 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files charles <charles@charleshope.demon.co.uk> - 2011-12-07 14:37 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files Raymond Wiker <raw@unknown-00-23-6c-8d-9e-26.lan> - 2011-12-07 15:43 +0100
Re: Protected PDF Files Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> - 2011-12-07 16:16 +0100
Re: Protected PDF Files Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2011-12-07 15:56 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> - 2011-12-07 17:38 +0100
Re: Protected PDF Files Richard Porter <dontusethis@address.uk.invalid> - 2011-12-12 23:27 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files Jeremy Nicoll - news posts <jn.nntp.scrap007@wingsandbeaks.org.uk> - 2011-12-13 02:45 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files Martin Wynn <m.wynn@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2011-12-13 17:27 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files Richard Porter <dontusethis@address.uk.invalid> - 2011-12-28 21:46 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-29 04:30 +0100
Re: Protected PDF Files Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-01-04 18:01 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files charles <charles@charleshope.demon.co.uk> - 2011-12-07 15:57 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> - 2011-12-07 17:43 +0100
Re: Protected PDF Files Gwyn <gwyn@gwyn-oakley.org.uk> - 2011-12-08 13:01 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2011-12-08 17:18 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2011-12-10 10:56 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files Chris Evans <chris@cjemicros.co.uk> - 2011-12-12 11:58 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files Richard Porter <dontusethis@address.uk.invalid> - 2011-12-12 23:02 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-12 16:57 +0100
Re: Protected PDF Files druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2011-12-13 21:05 +0000
Re: Protected PDF Files NedA <news@ned.uk.invalid> - 2011-12-13 22:04 +0000
csiph-web