Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1283381

Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available")

From Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available")
Date 2026-02-23 23:30 +0100
Message-ID <MrMBb-2PIv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <MrJWG-2NTx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MrMBb-2PIv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MrJWG-2NTx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MrMBb-2PIv-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


The /etc/exports entry on the server for the share in question is:

  /var/lib/openqa/share *(fsid=0,rw,no_root_squash,sync,no_subtree_check)

and the /etc/fstab entries on the clients (both of which show the behaviour) are:

  openqa.debian.net:/var/lib/openqa/share /var/lib/openqa/share nfs ro,fsc,soft,bg 0 0

and:

  openqa.debian.net:/var/lib/openqa/share /var/lib/openqa/share nfs nofail,ro,fsc,soft,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.requires=network-online.target,x-systemd.device-timeout=10s 0 0

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Bug#1128861: linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available" Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-23 20:40 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-23 23:30 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-24 00:40 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Acknowledgement (linux: when serving NFS, client attempts to lock served files fail with "No locks available") Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2026-02-24 01:30 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Revert 18744bc56b0ec appears to resolve it Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 01:50 +0100
  Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 03:20 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2026-02-24 14:00 +0100
    Bug#1128861: Regression: Missing check in nfsd_permission() causes -ENOLCK No locks available Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> - 2026-02-27 11:10 +0100

csiph-web