Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #484894

Before 1980, the desktop market was very young, very small.

From Jeff-Relf.Me @.
Message-ID <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.18--10.03am.Seattle.2019> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <3e2414e2-1a14-4584-8529-af6598ef38b2@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.17--11.56am.Seattle.2019> <7b124e5r0dgg625nfupvomacn1p6dd40l9@4ax.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.17--3.21pm.Seattle.2019> <4ab5ce01-e3e0-4b19-a09d-b6d3b78bad72@googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.checkmate
Subject Before 1980, the desktop market was very young, very small.
Organization blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date 2019-01-18 10:03 -0800

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

> > Before the IBM PC, 1980, the desktop market barely existed.
> 
> Apple II

Before 1980, the desktop market was very young, very small;
so standards were easy to change; no longer.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-17 11:56 -0800
  Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-17 17:45 -0500
    First and foremost, Microsoft sells compilers. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-17 15:21 -0800
      Re: First and foremost, Microsoft sells compilers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 19:15 -0800
      Before 1980, the desktop market was very young, very small. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-18 10:03 -0800
        Re: Before 1980, the desktop market was very young, very small. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 10:07 -0800
        Re: Before 1980, the desktop market was very young, very small. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-18 18:40 -0500
          Re: Before 1980, the desktop market was very young, very small. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 16:09 -0800
          You're supposed to buy all new hardware/software. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-18 17:31 -0800
            Re: You're supposed to buy all new hardware/software. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 18:13 -0800
            Re: You're supposed to buy all new hardware/software. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-18 21:39 -0500
              Re: You're supposed to buy all new hardware/software. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:01 -0800
              Re: You're supposed to buy all new hardware/software. "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:48 -0800
                Re: You're supposed to buy all new hardware/software. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 20:49 -0800
          Re: Before 1980, the desktop market was very young, very small. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 23:08 -0700
            Re: Before 1980, the desktop market was very young, very small. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 22:53 -0800
            Re: Before 1980, the desktop market was very young, very small. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 03:37 -0800
      Re: First and foremost, Microsoft sells compilers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 09:11 -0800
    Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-17 20:56 -0600
      Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-18 08:48 -0500
        Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Sergi o <invaliid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-18 10:42 -0600
        Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-18 11:59 -0500
          Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 09:51 -0800
        Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2019-01-18 23:14 +0100
          Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 14:34 -0800
          Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. PP <email2@lizards8912m.org> - 2019-01-18 22:53 +0000
            Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-18 18:46 -0500
              Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 23:09 -0700
        Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-19 10:46 -0500
          Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 08:01 -0800
          Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-01-19 16:08 +0000
            Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-19 11:29 -0500
              Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-01-19 16:35 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 09:04 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-19 14:23 -0500
              Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 19:07 +0000
          Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-19 11:27 -0500
            Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-01-19 16:29 +0000
              Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-19 14:23 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-01-19 22:24 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-19 22:44 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 04:04 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-20 08:29 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 22:58 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 00:26 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 00:57 -0800
            Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 19:04 +0000
              Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 11:23 -0800
              Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-19 14:37 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 19:51 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 12:27 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-19 20:41 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 12:59 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-19 22:36 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 04:03 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Pabst Blue Ribbon <pabst@blue.ribbon> - 2019-01-20 12:52 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 05:23 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 22:39 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-20 08:27 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 22:57 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 19:39 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 12:20 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 04:43 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 12:29 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 19:04 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 14:41 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 14:46 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 00:10 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 16:37 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 20:10 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 01:43 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 18:43 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-23 12:34 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 18:23 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 10:51 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-23 18:43 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 12:01 -0700
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 10:35 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Amanda KoXXX <iscariot694me@simplivr4.org> - 2019-01-23 20:49 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 13:43 -0800
              Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-01-20 09:53 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-20 12:37 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 12:39 -0800
          Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Pabst Blue Ribbon <pabst@blue.ribbon> - 2019-01-20 11:44 +0000
            Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 03:49 -0800
            Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0500
              Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 11:37 -0800
              Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 22:38 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 14:57 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 18:20 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Pabst Blue Ribbon <pabst@blue.ribbon> - 2019-01-21 21:43 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 23:21 +0000
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 14:15 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 12:27 -0800
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 12:25 -0500
                Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Pabst Blue Ribbon <pabst@blue.ribbon> - 2019-01-22 18:25 +0000
        Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-21 07:49 -0600
          Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 13:59 -0500
            Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-22 15:26 -0600
              Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. silverslimer <silver@slim.er> - 2019-01-22 20:08 -0500
    Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-01-18 03:52 +0000
      Re: CP/M cost 200$ more, so MicroSoft won the battle. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 20:17 -0800

csiph-web