Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #653876

Re: New version of my annotations to SRT

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> 1905 is Relativity without the Gravity
> 
> 1915 is Gravity without the Relativity
> 
> wats love gotodowitit?
> 
> Question, which one has the twins leaving on
> a rocket but not returning, and the twins
> leaving on a rocket but returning?
> 
> Question, which one has dilation with no gravity, and
> which one has dilation WITH gravity?
> 
> What do you call a theory that contains dilation but no gravity?
> 
> A dilated hypothesis!
> 
> It's a gravity-free dilation!
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Here is the difference between Einstein's 1905 paper and the 1915 paper...
> >
> > 1905 is without the Gravity
> >
> > 1915 is with the Gravity
> >
> > 1905 is without the Acceleration
> >
> > 1915 is with the Acceleration
> >
> > 1905 is without the rocket coming back
> >
> > 1915 is with the rocket coming back
> >
> > 1905 is with the train going one way
> >
> > 1915 is with the train making a connecting flight on
> > a rocket in order to come back
> >
> > 1905 is without the bandage
> >
> > 1915 is with the bandage
> >
> > 1905 is without finishing it
> >
> > 1915 is with the finishing
> >
> > 1905 is with the formula for the atomic bomb
> >
> > 1939 is puting the atomic bomb on a boat to
> > Germany because to too heavy for a plane to carry it.
> >
> > 1905 is without the Gravity but contains the formula
> > for the atomic bomb and no one notices it.
> >
> > Conclusion:
> >
> > The atomic bomb is Real and Gravity is still ...just a theory.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Volney wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/19/2024 2:30 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > JanPB wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Am 12.11.2023 um 19:17 schrieb Frauly Bagaryatsky:
> > > > > >>>> Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Actually you can read the annotations now online (without downloading
> > > > > >>>>>>> the file).
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> nonsense, that's completely bullshit. It displays you never been study
> > > > > >>>>>> at an university with a 𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗿.
> > > > > >>> Most likely a few specialists exist in Germany, who actually know.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> I was actually a HYPOTHETICAL professor (in my role as writer of these
> > > > > >>> annotations).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> The method goes like this:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> imagine you were a professor and had to write corrections for the
> > > > > >>> homework of a student (Albert Einstein in this case).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> The 'homework' is the text in question ('On the electrodynamics of
> > > > > >>> moving bodies' in this case).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> So my 'duty' would be to write annotations, where I give the student a
> > > > > >>> few hints, how to avoid errors next time.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> I found 428 errors in Einstein's text and therefore wrote so many
> > > > > >>> annotations.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> There are no errors in Einstein's paper. There are instances of sloppiness,
> > > > > >> bending over backwards, inconsequential omissions, and the like, all of which are
> > > > > >> typical of any science paper.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "inconsequential omissions"???? Like Albert Einstein's 1905 Relativity
> > > > > > paper NOT neven even mentioning ONCE 'Gravity'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > Duh-h-h! That was a paper on special relativity, and special relativity
> > > > > doesn't involve gravity!
> > > >
> > > > Time dilation special relativity 1905 paper is caused by relativity or gravity?
> > > >
> > >
> > > If you *steal* somebodies homework you liable to make the same mistakes.


Now, for some reason there are a lot of appologists, cover-ups, fraud in the scientific community.


Einstein submitted an incomplete paper in 1905 (was he trying to win a grant?)

It contained no mention of gravity
no mention of acceleration
no mentioned of velocity.

(inconsequential omissions??? unimportant? irrelevant????)mendacity! 

So, Einstein in 1907 came out with a ..'sequel' to the 1905 paper

and threw in gravity, acceleration and velocity to cover up his mistakes.

I mean, he had better things to think about...like building an atomic bomb.



 










-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: New version of my annotations to SRT film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) - 2024-05-18 18:41 +0000
  Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-18 21:30 +0200
  Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Badalbeili Turukhin <he@bbbh.ru> - 2024-05-18 22:01 +0000
  Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-18 23:30 -0700
    Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-05-19 13:42 -0400
      Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-19 12:10 -0700
        Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-19 12:27 -0700
        Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-22 13:57 +0200
        Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Cesario Fehér Buzás <jrs@receofh.hu> - 2024-05-22 15:31 +0000
        Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-05-22 02:18 -0400
          Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Procoro Cernochova Yang <oopoe@rcocpnc.cz> - 2024-05-24 11:23 +0000
      Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Justin Ali Kokkalis <kksjl@si.gr> - 2024-05-19 19:29 +0000
      Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-19 14:40 -0700
        Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-20 16:33 -0700
          Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-21 09:52 -0700
            Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-21 13:35 -0700
              Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-22 10:17 -0700

csiph-web