Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #662374
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc, alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: Off Topic-Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" |
| Date | 2024-08-04 11:46 +0200 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <1cb92741-c440-ecbb-be69-8e7a26297482@example.net> (permalink) |
| References | (14 earlier) <v8g8um$27mfm$1@dont-email.me> <v8gp9o$2bb4q$2@dont-email.me> <Dr4rO.2317$MJMb.857@fx43.iad> <32c4b03c-765c-c5e1-45c5-45e71da5d9f0@example.net> <suorO.45215$ZhK.19234@fx14.iad> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On Sat, 3 Aug 2024, CrudeSausage wrote: > On 2024-08-03 6:28 a.m., D wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, 2 Aug 2024, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> You mean cars that run on batteries whose production leaves a massive >>> carbon footprint >>> <https://www.industryweek.com/technology-and-iiot/article/22026518/lithium-batteries-dirty-secret-manufacturing-them-leaves-massive-carbon-footprint>, >>> which are only recycled at a rate of 1% >>> <https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/04/lithium-costs-a-lot-of-money-so-why-arent-we-recycling-lithium-batteries/>, >>> which spontaneous combust "rarely" >>> <https://www.cbsnews.com/news/lithium-ion-battery-fires-electric-cars-bikes-scooters-firefighters/> >>> and which are 79% less reliable than gas cars >>> <https://www.consumerreports.org/media-room/press-releases/2023/11/electric-vehicles-are-improving-but-charging-and-battery-issues-persist-in-consumer-reports-2023-annual-auto-reliability-survey/?msockid=287d4f79ae8b60c3236c5bb1afb0613d>. >>> >>> Once again, you are a ridiculous cretin. >>> >> >> Sorry Bobby, I have analyzed the thread and it does in fact seem like >> you are a ridiculous cretin. CrudeSausage is the clear winner here. > > Truth is the clear winner, not me. Can't you let a man troll in peace? ;) > When I was buying my first car in 2004 (late bloomer, I had a train station > nearby that always brought me straight to university and work), I actually > wanted a Prius. I had no interest in paying for gas because, at the time, I Last time I did the calculation, electric didn't even come close to the economy of a gasoline car. Hyrbid was much closer. I think today (many years later) the I could probably make a financial case for a hybrid over gasoline, but would have to run the excel spreadsheet again if I can find it. > didn't want to enrich Arabs. That's when I started doing a lot of research on > hybrid and electric cars and started realizing the pitfalls of having one. > > A lot of people love their electric cars, but a lot of people love their > unreliable Jeeps too. I remember reading one article where a guy's Tesla It's marketing and virtue signalling. I find it hilarious when I debate climate hysterics that they have an iphone worth 1000 USD and I have a button phone worth 50 USD. In addition, I keep mine until it breaks, while they somehow find the money to buy a new smart phone every 2-3 years. Isn't consumption supposed to damage the planet? ;) Marketing and virtue signalling. Creating a need where there is none.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Off Topic-Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-02 08:38 -0400
Re: Off Topic-Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-03 12:28 +0200
Re: Off Topic-Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-03 07:27 -0400
Re: Off Topic-Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-08-03 08:43 -0500
Re: Off Topic-Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-03 11:47 -0400
Re: Off Topic-Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" Bobbie Sellers <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> - 2024-08-03 15:38 -0700
Re: Off Topic-Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2024-08-04 09:34 +0100
Re: Off Topic-Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-04 07:24 -0400
Re: Off Topic-Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-04 07:15 -0400
Re: Off Topic-Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-04 11:46 +0200
Re: Off Topic-Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-04 07:42 -0400
Re: Off Topic-Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-05 13:25 +0200
Re: Off Topic-Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-05 08:10 -0400
csiph-web