Groups > comp.compilers > #2056

Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support

From	"Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.compilers
Subject	Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
Date	2018-04-10 23:14 +0100
Organization	virginmedia.com
Message-ID	<18-04-038@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References	<18-04-029@comp.compilers> <18-04-031@comp.compilers>

Show all headers | View raw

Anton,

> my counter-position papers are:
>
> http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/kps2015/proceedings/KPS_2015_submission_29.pdf
> http://www.kps2017.uni-jena.de/proceedings/kps2017_submission_5.pdf

and another position (which offers solutions):
http://shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com/2014/08/31/undefined-behavior-pay-up-for-shut-up/

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2018-04-10 16:11 +0100
  Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> - 2018-04-10 16:56 +0100
  Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-04-10 16:04 +0000
    Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> - 2018-04-10 23:14 +0100
      Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2018-04-13 13:55 +0100
  Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2018-04-10 11:04 -0700
  Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> - 2018-04-10 18:38 +0000

csiph-web