Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #360
| From | Christophe de Dinechin <christophe@taodyne.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Looking for volunteers for XL |
| Date | 2011-11-27 12:34 -0800 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Message-ID | <11-11-058@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <11-11-048@comp.compilers> <11-11-053@comp.compilers> <11-11-054@comp.compilers> |
On Nov 27, 12:19 am, "BartC" <b...@freeuk.com> wrote: > Extensible languages have to be used with some care I think. Those > features aren't for everyday use. Apply your reasoning to libraries, and you'll see its limits. "It's not necessary to make available to the Unix programmer all those untidy function-building features". I heard that exact reasoning from Basic gurus hearing about Pascal: "User-defined procedures? That can't be for everyday use. Who would need to add their own keywords? Leave that to Basic designers." In reality, the majority of notations, vocabulary, idioms are private, even in real life. The point of a programming language is to provide easy to use notations for your ideas. You can only benefit from the notations suiting the ideas better. The objections that making a language extensible necessarily makes it unreadable or fragile flies in the face of our experience with other forms of abstractions, and even of the limited experience we have with those few languages that are actually extensible, such as most Lisp derivatives. [Well, you know, given a choice between my personal experience that languages with extensible syntax led to unreadable programs, and hand-waving that this time is somehow different or I didn't see what I saw, I know what I'd choose. You're welcome to build any language you want, but you have a rather steep hill to climb to persuade people that your language doesn't have all the same problems that previous failures had. -John]
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Looking for volunteers for XL Christophe de Dinechin <christophe@taodyne.com> - 2011-11-22 21:03 -0800
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-11-26 05:43 +0000
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Christophe de Dinechin <christophe@taodyne.com> - 2011-11-26 12:38 -0800
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-26 23:19 +0000
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Christophe de Dinechin <christophe@taodyne.com> - 2011-11-27 12:34 -0800
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-27 22:24 +0000
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Christophe de Dinechin <christophe@taodyne.com> - 2011-11-28 14:12 -0800
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL ardjussi <jussi.santti@ard.fi> - 2011-11-30 13:16 -0800
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-12-01 05:44 +0000
Re: overloading, was Looking for volunteers for XL glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-12-02 05:36 +0000
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2012-01-03 09:28 -0800
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-11-28 04:45 +0000
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Timothy Knox <tdk@thelbane.com> - 2011-11-27 22:50 -0800
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2011-12-01 12:11 -0800
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-28 10:23 +0000
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-29 07:37 +0000
Re: macros, Looking for volunteers for XL Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-03 17:36 -0800
Re: macros, Looking for volunteers for XL glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-12-05 04:24 +0000
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-12-01 05:35 +0000
Re: designing language extensions, was Looking for volunteers for XL Marco van de Voort <marcov@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-12-03 13:02 +0000
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2011-12-13 00:08 +0000
Re: macros, was Looking for volunteers for XL Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-12-13 01:39 +0000
Re: macros, was Looking for volunteers for XL Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-12-14 19:00 +0000
Re: macros, was Looking for volunteers for XL jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2011-12-15 15:40 +0000
Re: macros, was Looking for volunteers for XL Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-12-16 17:48 +0000
Re: Looking for volunteers for XL glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-28 10:26 +0000
csiph-web