Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #618
| From | Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.visual.misc |
| Subject | Re: The Beep Function. |
| Date | 2012-01-08 17:27 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <0b4ig71phfugpe7evri76c66ch08lo41v0@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <je41pu$to6$1@dont-email.me> <gp7bg75hna40i095omjk6l27b1migv7o8e@4ax.com> <je4nl1$2bt$1@dont-email.me> <0ligg7tiaronch4uhoeg7kmjned1v4m428@4ax.com> <jeabb4$4b5$1@dont-email.me> |
"Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote: >"Gordon Levi" <gordon@address.invalid> wrote in message >news:0ligg7tiaronch4uhoeg7kmjned1v4m428@4ax.com... > >> You _want_ a false email address and RFC2606 >> <http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt> specifies exactly >> how to get a false email address. > > there are dozens of people in this >newsgroup who use email address names that could legitimately be registered >as a domain name by someone. Why have you not picked on them? They did not advise others to do the same and, anyway, they did not emphasise their address in the body of the post so I am unlikely to notice it. You have provided extensive, authoritative advice to many people including me and I am grateful. I apologise if this trivial correction made you feel "picked on". > To be honest >you are a total waste of space on this group. You have not answered a single >programming question. Given my knowledge of VB that is probably a good thing although I have provided some advice under a previous name. > You just popped up out of the blue to moan >specifically to me about doing something dozens of other people here do all >the time. You are a waste of bandwidth. I was trying to _save_ a little bandwidth by avoiding the domain name lookups that failing to deliver mail addressed to you requires. The TLD .invalid allows a spammer or his mail server to drop the spam immediately.
Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 06:15 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 07:11 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-04 15:38 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-04 16:16 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 10:15 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. Jim Mack <no-uce-ube@mdxi.com> - 2012-01-04 13:46 -0500
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-05 08:09 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-04 22:24 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-05 08:22 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-05 09:21 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2012-01-05 21:54 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-05 11:33 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2012-01-06 00:20 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-05 17:46 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-06 14:03 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2012-01-08 00:43 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-07 20:53 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2012-01-08 17:27 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-08 09:49 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-08 08:00 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-07 22:43 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-05 14:13 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-05 08:26 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-05 08:04 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 04:41 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-08 11:19 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-10 04:52 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2012-01-10 13:01 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Jim Mack <no-uce-ube@mdxi.com> - 2012-01-10 11:44 -0500
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-11 05:58 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-10 17:19 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-11 05:54 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-11 15:21 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-12 08:04 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-13 12:40 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-01-12 21:28 -0600
Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-13 15:34 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-13 05:25 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-14 07:32 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-13 11:06 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-13 05:48 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-13 15:09 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-14 04:29 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. Helmut_Meukel <Helmut_Meukel@bn-hof.invalid> - 2012-01-14 14:56 +0100
Re: The Beep Function. ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-01-14 10:24 -0600
Re: The Beep Function. Helmut_Meukel <Helmut_Meukel@bn-hof.invalid> - 2012-01-14 18:51 +0100
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-15 03:39 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. Schmidt <sss@online.de> - 2012-01-15 17:39 +0100
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-16 05:21 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-16 14:39 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-17 04:13 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-17 14:17 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-17 07:22 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "Henning" <computer_hero@coldmail.com> - 2012-01-17 17:47 +0100
Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-17 16:50 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. "Henning" <computer_hero@coldmail.com> - 2012-01-17 18:22 +0100
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-18 05:26 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-18 14:35 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-18 07:10 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-01-18 10:38 -0600
Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-19 05:42 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-19 11:33 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-21 03:16 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-19 05:17 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-20 05:17 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-20 03:54 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. Jason Keats <jkeats@melbpcDeleteThis.org.au> - 2012-01-20 23:40 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-21 03:20 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-21 15:20 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-21 03:23 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-20 05:11 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. Schmidt <sss@online.de> - 2012-01-17 18:58 +0100
Re: The Beep Function. Helmut_Meukel <Helmut_Meukel@bn-hof.invalid> - 2012-01-17 23:13 +0100
Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-18 09:12 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-01-18 09:22 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-01-18 05:39 -0600
Re: The Beep Function. Helmut_Meukel <Helmut_Meukel@bn-hof.invalid> - 2012-01-18 13:32 +0100
Re: The Beep Function. ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2012-01-15 13:30 -0600
Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-16 06:59 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-16 06:55 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-16 06:06 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-01-13 22:34 +0000
Re: The Beep Function. "blank" <blank@blankety.blank.com> - 2012-01-14 19:50 +1100
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-14 05:10 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-14 06:16 -0800
Re: The Beep Function. "Henning" <computer_hero@coldmail.com> - 2012-01-19 20:25 +0100
Re: The Beep Function. Peter Nolan <peter.nolan40@gmail.com> - 2012-01-20 03:56 -0800
csiph-web