Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: uk.telecom
Subject: Re: Advert for BT disguised as news, or public information film?
Date: Sun, 03 May 2026 13:02:27 +0100
Organization: Frantic
Message-ID: <827bpk4s6k.fsf@example.com>
References: <82y0i23r4g.fsf@example.com> <10t55bi$28oho$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="82792"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jiwB7+0T7DHOy11Fmob+toYgQeI= sha1:6mh+KP8Gc9+DhTKRPFf7SKgrpGk=
X-User-ID: eJwNxMkBwCAMA7CVchrWMQHvP0KrhzrhmFVoVKvlx5PatA43qPj+napLiyVu5qVePuWcwHwkYBH+
Xref: csiph.com uk.telecom:39425

David Wade <dave@g4ugm.invalid> writes:

> I don't think the supplier matters. BT are as capable, indeed some may
> say more capable of fubar-ing any upgrade, downgrade or service
> change.

I am puzzled by the no extra cost bit, as for me there was the extra
cost of fibre. Maybe if you have no broadband there is no extra cost.