Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > uk.telecom.mobile > #47036
| From | alan_m <junk@admac.myzen.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.telecom.mobile, uk.d-i-y |
| Subject | Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? |
| Date | 2026-03-15 19:28 +0000 |
| Organization | At Home |
| Message-ID | <n1ofi6Fkk74U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <10ous13$26quq$1@dont-email.me> <n1gl1gFemkdU10@mid.individual.net> <10p13e9$35da3$1@dont-email.me> <10p13td$30rut$30@dont-email.me> <10p6q9a$19gvr$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 15/03/2026 17:29, Chris wrote:
> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 13/03/2026 13:28, Woody wrote:
>>> The phone will usually get warm when it is in use, i.e.transmitting and
>>> receiving constantly.
>>
>> My phone is permanently plugged into this desktop except when I am out
>> and about so its always on charge And it is always warm.
>
> That's not a great plan. Constantly charging the phone can reduce its
> lifespan significantly.
>
Many manufactures of phones and laptops recommend that you only charge
to 80% and incorporate inbuilt software to allow users to configure that
option. My Samsung phone has this feature and will report that "charging
has stopped to protect the battery"
For the Motorola 5G
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p-3HMak2eU
--
mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk
Back to uk.telecom.mobile | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? David <wibble@btinternet.com> - 2026-03-12 20:12 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com> - 2026-03-13 13:28 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-03-13 13:36 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-03-15 17:29 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? alan_m <junk@admac.myzen.co.uk> - 2026-03-15 19:28 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2026-03-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-03-16 07:28 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? alan_m <junk@admac.myzen.co.uk> - 2026-03-16 08:17 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-03-16 23:34 -0400
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2026-03-16 08:57 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-03-17 00:19 -0400
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-03-16 20:14 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> - 2026-03-16 10:44 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2026-03-16 11:29 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-03-16 14:23 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> - 2026-03-16 15:31 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2026-03-16 17:17 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2026-03-16 18:48 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-03-17 10:34 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> - 2026-03-17 11:33 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2026-03-17 12:54 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> - 2026-03-17 09:52 +0000
Re: Phone battery is it fu*ked? David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> - 2026-03-14 12:57 +0000
csiph-web