Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "David B." <"David B."@invalid.org> Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,uk.comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: You can protect your Mac from malware by following three simple rules! Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 10:22:01 +0100 Organization: Retired Lines: 72 Message-ID: References: <69da5194$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <69da61af$2$55442$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> Reply-To: boaterdave@hotmail.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net GiQKhOihlbwt2XD+dyuKRwIJgUojYyg8ZGqoZC8PTwv03TXqju Cancel-Lock: sha1:57auVGdcbZ3HTdyZjiXnc1lkorQ= sha256:eTaq9BoWOe+VtleEFV1qokOqpKbbvBLX5VMEvrzH2nU= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com uk.comp.sys.mac:183537 On 20/05/2026 03:51, Gremlin wrote: > "David B." news:n6tqfkFk1bjU1@mid.individual.net > Sun, 17 May 2026 12:26:28 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > >> I'd like to take up one specific point with you. Even if a product user >> elects to NOT save an EtreCheck report, a complete copy *IS* kept on the >> user's computer, hidden away where most folk will not find it. > > Why do you think it's hidden away where most people wouldn't find it? I don't just THINK it is - it *IS* hidden! One has to use the "option" key to actually FIND the LIBRARY entry where the containing folder may be found. It's hidden away in "Application Support" in a folder called "EtreCheck". Within THAT folder is another one called "PreviousReports". I A great "find" application called EasyFind doesn't report the old EtreCheck reports, neither does the Apple "Spotlight" search. They are, as I said, well hidden. *WHY* are they there???? >> One of the features of EtreCheck is that when it is opened it will >> 'phone home' to Etresoft to check for updates. By so doing it provides >> John Daniel the actual IP address of the user. > > It provides an IP address. It can't get the specific user from an IP address > alone. You have heard of networks, right? Indeed I have! >> You are well aware that unscrupulous characters can use that information >> to scan for open ports and, if found, can sneak into a computer unseen. > > That's a gross over simplification of the process, David. Thank you for confirming that is *IS* possible! >> I don't dispute that I was once visited my local police. Many folk >> reading here will probably be unaware of that! > > Some? might not have known about it. Those of us who have known you for a long > time do know about it. We watched it go down, virtually speaking. Of course. I've never denied it. >> I have no way of /knowing/ what is true and what is not. > > Then you shouldn't blindly repeat what you are told, David. Especially by > someone with a history such as Snits. I have OTHER friends, Dustin! 😉 >> I am an *INVESTIGATOR*, Dustin Cook. > > No, you are nothing of the kind. You are infact, a slightly demented, stalker, > and, other things. >> I discovered that *YOU* were a *VIRUS WRITER*!!!!!! > > You discovered something that's been public information for almost a decade > longer than I've known you? Exactly how did you do this? > An investigator you are not. An idiot, you are. I used SOPHOS at work. A fellow you once clashed swords with also worked for SOPHOS. A good man by all accounts. Do you remember his name?!!! That's how I found you! Here's a reminder! https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.virus/c/mztWdeoWoGU -- Kind regards, David