Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system,uk.comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel...
Date: 29 Apr 2017 14:34:53 GMT
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <emjmkcFbc1kU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <2017042619201161432-gavin.lawrie@2gc.eu> <590104a9$0$36059$c3e8da3$76a7c58f@news.astraweb.com> <slrnog3fbe.jnv.g.kreme@snow.local> <59022ff3$0$22780$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com> <slrnog696f.lhc.g.kreme@snow.local> <59038ed4$0$10750$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com> <emhi97Ftb4jU2@mid.individual.net> <590400e6$0$34646$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net YTjsbvPDsf6xnlHb8nb/XAiSruyas36LXAP5OveixPdHgY+lpy
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/hExRm/035be6Iw2FWkLbxPHru0= sha1:gxQ9bqAh9NRJO7F5oll3fHCfL9U=
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.2.6 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:105838 uk.comp.sys.mac:117495

JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> On 2017-04-28 15:08, Jolly Roger wrote:
> 
>> Core Storage-based Fusion Drives aren't in any way equivalent to RAID 0.
> 
> 
> They are a superset of Raid 0. 

No. Core Storage does not use RAID 0 in any way. You just can't stop
spewing misinformation from your big mouth, can you?

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR