Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > uk.comp.os.linux > #23754
| From | Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.comp.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: TRIM |
| Date | 2025-09-17 10:30 +0100 |
| Organization | Daniel James |
| Message-ID | <10adv4h$34co5$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <109mcdb$74et$1@dont-email.me> <1757344306@f1.n250.z2.fidonet.ftn> <109n06l$dgjs$1@dont-email.me> <10a99mt$20lgp$1@dont-email.me> <wwvikhhfrso.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> |
On 17/09/2025 08:43, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > A little more complicated than that. ... Yes, I know, but I was trying to keep things simple. Maybe too simple, so thanks for your addition. -- Cheers, Daniel.
Back to uk.comp.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-02 11:03 +0100
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-03 08:57 +0100
Re: Here we go again Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2025-09-03 16:49 +0100
Re: Here we go again Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-09-03 17:21 +0100
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-03 17:48 +0100
Re: Here we go again Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-09-03 18:20 +0100
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-03 20:10 +0100
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-03 20:50 +0100
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-04 11:35 +0100
Re: Here we go again Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2025-09-04 17:30 +0100
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-04 19:52 +0100
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-05 23:49 +0100
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-08 11:50 +0100
Re: Here we go again "Vincent Coen" <VBCoen@gmail.com> - 2025-09-08 16:11 +0100
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-08 17:28 +0100
TRIM (Was: Here we go again) Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2025-09-15 16:00 +0100
Re: TRIM (Was: Here we go again) Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-15 17:30 +0100
Re: TRIM Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-17 08:43 +0100
Re: TRIM Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2025-09-17 10:30 +0100
Re: TRIM Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-17 11:05 +0100
Re: TRIM Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2025-09-17 15:12 +0100
Re: TRIM Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-17 15:54 +0100
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-09 09:04 +0100
Re: Here we go again "Vincent Coen" <VBCoen@gmail.com> - 2025-09-09 12:19 +0100
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-09 18:03 +0100
Re: Here we go again "Vincent Coen" <VBCoen@gmail.com> - 2025-09-09 22:02 +0100
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-10 00:14 +0100
Re: Here we go again -Update Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-11 17:12 +0100
Re: Here we go again -Update Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-21 16:10 +0100
Re: Here we go again -Update "Vincent Coen" <VBCoen@gmail.com> - 2025-09-22 01:41 +0100
Re: Here we go again -Update Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-22 09:29 +0100
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-10 12:43 +0100
Re: Here we go again Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-09-08 21:33 +0100
Re: Here we go again Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2025-09-04 20:07 +0100
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-05 02:47 +0100
Re: Here we go again Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> - 2025-09-03 23:46 +0000
Re: Here we go again Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2025-09-04 09:36 +0100
Re: Here we go again Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> - 2025-09-03 23:31 +0000
csiph-web