Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!eu1.netnews.com!not-for-mail X-Trace: DXC=SXQ=Y0P22YQ;F=FKDTG6iTVPK>l0=NjBT]1LaAS32<@]>0[NkJ?RQ>_]b?ch_V=H5W=kL`U3V6fhUQ <2cf4512a-8be6-647f-8a7f-a2b3d81d7bc8@ashikaga.tokugawa> <57306913-713b-8fce-0173-9ed296c730f7@ashikaga.tokugawa> <69d40b28-6906-8936-8218-c1886c5c71e5@shinku.aoyagi.konjou> <88d34950-1032-091b-45e5-f1b45f1896ed@shinku.aoyagi.konjou> From: jojo Organization: jieigyou X-No-Archive: Yes Message-ID: <2ff752a2-ec30-35f8-cf63-31f7c94f0b16@shinku.aoyagi.konjou> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 23:49:46 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 131 NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Trace: 1741909797 reader.netnews.com 16 127.0.0.1:47433 Xref: csiph.com alt.atheism:3436268 talk.atheism:103108 alt.agnosticism:78383 talk.philosophy.humanism:1932 sci.skeptic:113171 % wrote: > jojo wrote: >> % wrote: >>> jojo wrote: >>>> % wrote: >>>>> jojo wrote: >>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun : >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun : >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shogun writes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia “educates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of religion which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago is no longer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Relevant to what? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020s and post. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Islamic controlled world, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> social circle, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong, being on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it provides no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> become obsolete. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> already knew I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was correct. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nice. so are you a pious person? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my >>>>>>>>>>>> comment either way. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and >>>>>>>>>>> want to know >>>>>>>>>>> the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of >>>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> that's a nice dream. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Isn't it, though? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism >>>>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to >>>>>>>> your social circle. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey Bob, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) >>>>>>> Internet away, and until that happens, discretion is advised. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dawn >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> where did you get it , by the train tracks >>>> >>>> i got it because my cells differentiated because i have a y >>>> chromosome.. aaa capiche? >>>> >>> that's no reason >> >> that is all the reason and the only reason. >> > sorry , you have to post a pic with it beside your face lol i am not posting it here or anywhere! now that i think about it, i have never taken its pic...