Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > soc.history.ancient > #49058
| From | Dude <punditster@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, sci.skeptic, soc.history.ancient, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.messianic |
| Subject | Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis is falsified |
| Date | 2026-01-25 11:05 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10l5ph5$1t47d$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <10krsde$2j4gp$2@dont-email.me> <10kv2qm$3iiom$2@dont-email.me> <10l4dj4$1e2pk$5@dont-email.me> <10l4l74$1gj32$1@dont-email.me> <i%mdR.75315$3wQ3.71569@fx14.ams4> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On 1/25/2026 3:19 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote: > Le 25/01/2026 à 09:45, dart200 a écrit : >> On 1/24/26 10:35 PM, JTEM wrote: >>> On 1/23/26 1:00 AM, dart200 wrote: >>> >>>> i'm sorry, did i post any predictions? no >>> >>> Then AGW isn't science. Because you can't have a >>> valid hypothesis without predictions. >> >> my nigga, that downward trend is pure observation... >> >> form ur own conclusions moron, >> >> and don't come to the wrong one ehh???? > > Climate change hypothesis were embeded in CMIP climate models. > Climate models output don't match reality. Climate model output > variations don't mactch observations variations over long periods. > Current climate change hypothesis have been falsified. > Finally! Something interesting to talk about: the weather.
Back to soc.history.ancient | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis is falsified JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2026-01-21 19:53 -0500
Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis is falsified dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-01-22 22:00 -0800
Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis is falsified JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2026-01-25 01:35 -0500
Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis is falsified dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-01-25 00:45 -0800
Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis is falsified Paul Aubrin <paul.aubrin@invalid.org> - 2026-01-25 12:19 +0100
Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis is falsified Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-01-25 11:05 -0800
Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis is falsified dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-01-25 22:54 -0800
Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis is falsified JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2026-01-26 15:13 -0500
Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis is falsified dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-01-28 12:01 -0800
Re: If predictions fail your hypothesis is falsified JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2026-01-29 00:19 -0500
csiph-web