Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.space.shuttle > #9538
| From | Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.space.shuttle, sci.space.history, sci.space.policy |
| Subject | Re: 40th anniversary of first US manned craft re-use. |
| Date | 2021-11-22 15:29 -0800 |
| Organization | Dis One |
| Message-ID | <mn.b3a17e5be0d76f56.127094@snitoo> (permalink) |
| References | <mn.8c367e5b784fcce2.127094@snitoo> <bBklJ.68377$Wkjc.23879@fx35.iad> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
JF Mezei is guilty of <bBklJ.68377$Wkjc.23879@fx35.iad> as of 11/17/2021 8:25:43 PM > On 2021-11-17 20:58, Snidely wrote: > >> (For JFM, there's a picture of /Columbia/ descending to Edwards. The >> angle is chosen to give the most appropriate airspeed; > > > Would it be fair to state that the descent rate wouldn't be that > different, but by gaining speed, shen they do the final flare up, the > wings get the descent rate top drop to near 0 for a smooth landing ? > > With low airspeed, they wouldn't be able to droop the descent rate by > much when they flare up, right ? I'm only an armchair pilot. I would be willing to guess that the CDRs and PLTs have tried this in the simulator, just because, and the crews on the later flights had very much improved simulators. I am willing to guess that trying for level flight is not useful in a Shuttle. /dps -- There's nothing inherently wrong with Big Data. What matters, as it does for Arnold Lund in California or Richard Rothman in Baltimore, are the questions -- old and new, good and bad -- this newest tool lets us ask. (R. Lerhman, CSMonitor.com)
Back to sci.space.shuttle | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
40th anniversary of first US manned craft re-use. Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2021-11-17 17:58 -0800
Re: 40th anniversary of first US manned craft re-use. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2021-11-17 23:25 -0500
Re: 40th anniversary of first US manned craft re-use. Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2021-11-22 15:29 -0800
csiph-web