Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #892785 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-05-18 17:23 -0700 |
| Last post | 2025-06-21 15:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 231 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
"The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-18 17:23 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-18 21:27 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-19 08:58 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-19 22:46 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-20 16:57 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-20 08:21 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-20 17:07 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-20 22:27 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-24 23:56 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-26 08:03 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-26 10:47 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-27 09:07 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-05-27 21:37 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-28 08:02 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-05-28 12:00 -0500
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-05-28 17:11 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-31 08:41 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-05-31 17:28 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-01 09:39 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-01 17:57 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-02 18:49 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-02 18:49 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-03 09:11 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-03 14:41 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-04 08:55 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-03 06:17 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-03 14:45 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-04 08:05 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-02 01:02 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-01 00:55 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-01 00:26 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-02 17:43 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-06 00:03 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-07 01:28 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-06-07 12:35 -0500
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-07 23:44 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-09 07:04 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-08 23:49 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-10 06:56 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-10 18:23 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-11 08:01 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-13 10:14 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-14 09:03 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-14 01:23 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 10:08 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 09:03 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-15 12:58 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 03:38 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-18 09:56 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-18 09:30 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 12:55 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-19 10:02 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-19 01:13 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-19 08:54 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-18 22:41 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-19 01:07 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-20 09:17 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-20 12:00 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-20 12:07 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-20 12:40 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-21 09:22 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-21 00:50 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-24 12:09 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-24 03:25 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-25 09:41 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-25 10:20 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-25 11:27 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-27 08:04 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" J Carlson <notgenx32@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-27 09:19 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-28 18:28 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-21 09:19 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-24 12:14 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-24 03:28 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-24 10:02 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-27 07:39 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-27 06:04 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-27 09:18 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-27 10:16 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" J Carlson <notgenx32@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-27 11:38 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-27 13:13 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-28 18:32 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-28 10:12 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-13 22:25 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-14 08:38 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-27 23:35 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-25 09:40 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-25 09:47 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 16:31 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-13 22:23 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-14 08:35 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-07-14 16:58 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-15 20:23 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-07-15 16:45 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-07-15 01:50 +0000
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-19 18:15 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-07-21 01:27 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-21 09:02 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-21 19:12 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-21 23:06 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-23 11:21 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" x <x@x.net> - 2025-07-23 11:24 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-23 13:03 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" x <x@x.net> - 2025-07-23 14:46 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-23 16:31 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-07-23 21:41 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-27 23:38 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-23 11:25 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-07-23 22:03 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-23 14:04 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-23 15:37 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" x <x@x.net> - 2025-07-23 15:46 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-07-24 13:00 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-24 13:51 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-07-25 22:12 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-25 14:11 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-25 19:35 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 00:44 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-25 19:42 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-25 19:46 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-25 19:49 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-25 21:17 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 15:26 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-27 13:39 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-27 13:57 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-27 14:33 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-07-27 17:04 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" squalk <sq@net.inv> - 2025-07-28 00:05 +0100
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-07-27 17:03 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-25 19:33 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 00:44 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-26 12:01 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 15:29 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-07-27 13:00 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-07-27 17:33 +0000
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-27 11:06 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-07-27 11:40 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-28 20:38 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-07-23 21:43 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 19:51 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 19:51 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-27 23:34 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-28 01:47 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-02 23:47 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-28 20:43 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-07-14 04:01 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 13:09 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 13:11 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-20 15:13 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-23 22:41 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-07-24 11:11 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-24 13:15 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-07-25 22:12 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 00:42 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-26 12:02 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" x <x@x.net> - 2025-07-26 14:43 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-07-27 10:22 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-27 13:37 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" x <x@x.net> - 2025-07-26 13:53 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-06-30 22:56 -0500
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-18 09:49 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-18 09:30 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 12:58 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-15 18:09 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 14:09 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-16 15:08 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 12:39 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-16 17:37 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-17 07:36 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-15 10:08 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-06-15 17:52 +0000
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 03:44 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-18 22:17 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-15 11:25 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 16:32 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-15 17:59 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 03:46 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-18 10:04 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-18 09:30 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 13:00 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-18 06:56 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-17 07:44 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-17 23:02 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-06-17 20:05 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-16 03:40 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-15 18:44 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-16 09:46 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-16 16:58 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-17 00:58 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-18 10:23 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 13:06 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-18 15:41 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-18 13:58 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-19 06:12 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-19 07:12 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-19 12:28 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-19 16:40 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-18 14:47 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 14:53 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-18 10:07 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-18 09:18 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-19 09:36 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-19 08:54 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-18 09:30 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-19 09:58 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-19 01:23 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-20 09:26 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-20 12:01 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-21 09:13 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-21 00:49 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-19 08:54 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-20 09:38 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2025-06-20 12:01 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 13:02 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-18 13:09 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-18 15:15 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Craig <x@y.com> - 2025-06-18 18:25 +0000
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 20:54 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-14 19:57 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-15 18:13 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 18:49 -0400
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 09:53 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Oleg Smirnov" <os333@netc.eu> - 2025-06-15 14:45 +0300
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-17 07:27 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Oleg Smirnov" <os333@netc.eu> - 2025-06-17 16:25 +0300
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-18 10:28 +0200
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Oleg Smirnov" <os333@netc.eu> - 2025-06-19 12:55 +0300
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-01 23:10 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-31 23:13 -0600
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-05-18 23:47 -0500
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 15:40 -0700
Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 15:45 -0700
Page 8 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 12 Next page →
| From | Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-27 23:34 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <106724s$21sop$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #893936 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk: >>>>>>>> Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just >>>>>>>> scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes >>>>>>>> proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>> no bombs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them. >>>>>> >>>>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you >>>>>> fucking Lügner. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one >>>>> or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. >>>> >>>> The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an >>>> atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not. >>> >>> There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have >>> actually built atomic bombs. >>> >>> But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not >>> been born then. >> >> That's what history and historians are for. > > Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because Huh? Churchill paid EVERY historian in the world? > Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only). https://slate.com/culture/2019/11/history-is-written-by-the-victors-quote-origin.html > So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII). What about the histories written by non British authors?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-28 01:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1067dfp$3eqcf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #894199 |
Gronk wrote: > Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk: >>>>>>>>> Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just >>>>>>>>> scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes >>>>>>>>> proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>>> no bombs. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>> them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you >>>>>>> fucking Lügner. >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased >>>>>> one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. >>>>> >>>>> The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an >>>>> atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not. >>>> >>>> There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have >>>> actually built atomic bombs. >>>> >>>> But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not >>>> been born then. >>> >>> That's what history and historians are for. >> >> Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because > > Huh? Churchill paid EVERY historian in the world? > >> Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only). > > https://slate.com/culture/2019/11/history-is-written-by-the-victors-quote-origin.html > > >> So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII). > > What about the histories written by non British authors? > Rejected. <https://ww2f.com/threads/controversy-of-german-generals-memoirs.51233/#google_vignette> -- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @ Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\ The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \ of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-02 23:47 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <106mt55$1esfb$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #894202 |
chine.bleu wrote: > Gronk wrote: >> Thomas Heger wrote: >>> Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk: >>>>>>>>>> Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just >>>>>>>>>> scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes >>>>>>>>>> proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and >>>>>>>>>> no bombs. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>>> them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you >>>>>>>> fucking Lügner. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased >>>>>>> one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an >>>>>> atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not. >>>>> >>>>> There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have >>>>> actually built atomic bombs. >>>>> >>>>> But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not >>>>> been born then. >>>> >>>> That's what history and historians are for. >>> >>> Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because >> >> Huh? Churchill paid EVERY historian in the world? >> >>> Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only). >> >> https://slate.com/culture/2019/11/history-is-written-by-the-victors-quote-origin.html >> >> >> >>> So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII). >> >> What about the histories written by non British authors? >> > > Rejected. > > <https://ww2f.com/threads/controversy-of-german-generals-memoirs.51233/#google_vignette> But translated by British authors?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-28 20:43 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mepugrF4fvnU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #894199 |
Am Montag000028, 28.07.2025 um 07:34 schrieb Gronk: ... >>>> There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have >>>> actually built atomic bombs. >>>> >>>> But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not >>>> been born then. >>> >>> That's what history and historians are for. >> >> Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because > > Huh? Churchill paid EVERY historian in the world? > >> Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only). > > https://slate.com/culture/2019/11/history-is-written-by-the-victors- > quote-origin.html > >> So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII). > > What about the histories written by non British authors? > Well, it wasn't not mainly 'British', what would make someone a member of the club, but being member of the club. Other 'wannabe' bestseller authors were sent to the GULAG, if the content of their books wasn't in the interest of the victors. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-14 04:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1052o38$3ci83$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #893932 |
Gronk wrote: > Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am Freitag000020, 20.06.2025 um 21:40 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie: >>>>>>>> The scholarly consensus is that it failed to >>>>>>>> achieve these goals, and that despite fears at >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just >>>>>>> scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved >>>>>>> Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs. >>>>>>> >>>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them. >>>>> >>>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you >>>>> fucking Lügner. >>>> >>>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one >>>> or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. >>> >>> The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an >>> atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not. >> >> There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have >> actually built atomic bombs. >> >> But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not >> been born then. > > That's what history and historians are for. > >> So, well, yes, maybe... >> >> ...possibly the Nazis had in fact no a-bombs. >> >> (possibly they had...) > No. Not even close. Sounds like a Wehraboo or worst a German neonazi. Chest thumping the ME262 and dismissal of the Gloster Meteor was telling. -- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @ Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\ The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \ of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-21 13:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <10373ia$18ohr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #893454 |
On 6/20/2025 12:40 PM, OrigInfoJunkie wrote: > On 6/20/2025 12:07 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 6/20/2025 12:00 PM, OrigInfoJunkie wrote: >>> On 6/20/2025 12:17 AM, Thomas Heger gelogen: >>>> Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 10:07 schrieb Siri Cruz: >>>>> On 18/6/25 21:41, Gronk wrote: >>>>>> "Developments took place in several phases, >>>>>> but in the words of historian Mark Walker, it >>>>>> ultimately became "frozen at the laboratory >>>>>> level" with the "modest goal" to "build a >>>>>> nuclear reactor which could sustain a nuclear >>>>>> fission chain reaction for a significant amount >>>>> >>>>> Nuclear reactors need a device to slow down neutrons so that the >>>>> chain reaction is sustains at a low power. Weapons do not slow down >>>>> neutrons. They sustain the reaction at a high power that cannot be >>>>> contained. >>>>> >>>>> One way to slow down neutrons is let them bounce off heavy water >>>>> molecules. Another is bounce off carbon atoms in graphite. In 1943 >>>>> graphite was contaminated with boron which removed neutrons >>>>> altogether. So Germans decided to use heavy water which they became >>>>> fixated on. They never could get enough so they never had any >>>>> reactor or self-sustaining chain reaction. Fermi and Americans >>>>> realised they could clean boron out of graphite. Fermi got the >>>>> first reactor running in 1943. They built more reactors; they >>>>> discoverred a new element in the reactor ash which led to breeder >>>>> reactors and Plutonium as a fissile metal along with U235. >>>>> Plutonium could be refined with chemistry. >>>>> >>>>>> of time and to achieve the complete separation >>>>>> of at least tiny amounts of the uranium isotopes". >>>>> >>>>> All Uranium isotopes have the same chemistry so it requires very >>>>> expensive methods depending on slightly different nucleus weights. >>>>> It requires a lot of electricity, space, and machinery. Only the >>>>> USA could afford this whilst fighting a war. >>>>> >>>>>> The scholarly consensus is that it failed to >>>>>> achieve these goals, and that despite fears at >>>>> >>>>> Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just >>>>> scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved >>>>> Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs. >>>>> >>>> >>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them. >>> >>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you >>> fucking Lügner. >> >> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one or >> two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. > > The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an atomic > bomb. It's a lie. They did not. > >> >> Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes! > > > Israel has made no military attack on North Korea. They bombed a North Korean built reactor in Syria, iirc? > I doubt Israel could > even undertake sabotage in North Korea. They did, however, attack a > suspected reactor site in Syria that was believed to have North Korean > assistance in its development.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-21 13:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <10373ku$18oig$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #893476 |
On 6/21/2025 1:09 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 6/20/2025 12:40 PM, OrigInfoJunkie wrote: >> On 6/20/2025 12:07 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>> On 6/20/2025 12:00 PM, OrigInfoJunkie wrote: >>>> On 6/20/2025 12:17 AM, Thomas Heger gelogen: >>>>> Am Donnerstag000019, 19.06.2025 um 10:07 schrieb Siri Cruz: >>>>>> On 18/6/25 21:41, Gronk wrote: >>>>>>> "Developments took place in several phases, >>>>>>> but in the words of historian Mark Walker, it >>>>>>> ultimately became "frozen at the laboratory >>>>>>> level" with the "modest goal" to "build a >>>>>>> nuclear reactor which could sustain a nuclear >>>>>>> fission chain reaction for a significant amount >>>>>> >>>>>> Nuclear reactors need a device to slow down neutrons so that the >>>>>> chain reaction is sustains at a low power. Weapons do not slow >>>>>> down neutrons. They sustain the reaction at a high power that >>>>>> cannot be contained. >>>>>> >>>>>> One way to slow down neutrons is let them bounce off heavy water >>>>>> molecules. Another is bounce off carbon atoms in graphite. In 1943 >>>>>> graphite was contaminated with boron which removed neutrons >>>>>> altogether. So Germans decided to use heavy water which they >>>>>> became fixated on. They never could get enough so they never had >>>>>> any reactor or self-sustaining chain reaction. Fermi and Americans >>>>>> realised they could clean boron out of graphite. Fermi got the >>>>>> first reactor running in 1943. They built more reactors; they >>>>>> discoverred a new element in the reactor ash which led to breeder >>>>>> reactors and Plutonium as a fissile metal along with U235. >>>>>> Plutonium could be refined with chemistry. >>>>>> >>>>>>> of time and to achieve the complete separation >>>>>>> of at least tiny amounts of the uranium isotopes". >>>>>> >>>>>> All Uranium isotopes have the same chemistry so it requires very >>>>>> expensive methods depending on slightly different nucleus weights. >>>>>> It requires a lot of electricity, space, and machinery. Only the >>>>>> USA could afford this whilst fighting a war. >>>>>> >>>>>>> The scholarly consensus is that it failed to >>>>>>> achieve these goals, and that despite fears at >>>>>> >>>>>> Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just >>>>>> scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes proved >>>>>> Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment, and no bombs. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for them. >>>> >>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you >>>> fucking Lügner. >>> >>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased one >>> or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. >> >> The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an >> atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not. >> >>> >>> Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes! >> >> >> Israel has made no military attack on North Korea. > > They bombed a North Korean built reactor in Syria, iirc? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Outside_the_Box ? > > >> I doubt Israel could even undertake sabotage in North Korea. They did, >> however, attack a suspected reactor site in Syria that was believed to >> have North Korean assistance in its development. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-20 15:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1034mdf$99rb$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #893448 |
On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>> them. >> >> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, >> you fucking Lügner. > > Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased > one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o > > Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes! The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and watched. -- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \ of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-23 22:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <105sh36$1bk2i$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #893455 |
On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote: > On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>> them. >>> >>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, >>> you fucking Lügner. >> >> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased >> one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o >> >> Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes! > > The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and > watched. > Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and anti-ship drone mine arrays?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-24 11:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <f4j48k1qqb1r0ahvcc5vm78jpr13u2om9r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #894154 |
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: >On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote: >> On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>> them. >>>> >>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, >>>> you fucking Lügner. >>> >>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased >>> one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o >>> >>> Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes! >> >> The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and >> watched. >> > >Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and >anti-ship drone mine arrays? LOL! The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up. Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it hit too fast, listed and capsized. Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch. I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a boat properly. -- Superman is an illegal immigrant! 8647
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-24 13:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <105u495$qnlj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #894156 |
On 7/24/2025 8:11 AM, Governor Swill wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" > <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote: >>> On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>> them. >>>>> >>>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, >>>>> you fucking Lügner. >>>> >>>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased >>>> one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o >>>> >>>> Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes! >>> >>> The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and >>> watched. >>> >> >> Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and >> anti-ship drone mine arrays? > > LOL! > > The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up. > Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it > hit too fast, listed and capsized. > > Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch. > > I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a > boat properly. Touche. wow.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-25 22:12 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1rg1oem.1lkihhcf1f2koN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #894156 |
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" > <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote: > >> On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > >>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for > >>>>> them. > >>>> > >>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, > >>>> you fucking Lügner. > >>> > >>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased > >>> one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o > >>> > >>> Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes! > >> > >> The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and > >> watched. > >> > > > >Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and > >anti-ship drone mine arrays? > > LOL! > > The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up. > Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it > hit too fast, listed and capsized. > > Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch. > > I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a > boat properly. You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you? Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-26 00:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <10620th$2bm8d$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #894162 |
On 7/25/2025 1:12 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" >> <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote: >>>> On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>> them. >>>>>> >>>>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, >>>>>> you fucking Lügner. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased >>>>> one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o >>>>> >>>>> Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes! >>>> >>>> The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and >>>> watched. >>>> >>> >>> Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and >>> anti-ship drone mine arrays? >> >> LOL! >> >> The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up. >> Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it >> hit too fast, listed and capsized. >> >> Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch. >> >> I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a >> boat properly. > > You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you? Good point. If they get into the crazy hands, well... They say we need to nuke to perhaps help bring about the great event from some religious prophecy or something? Yikes!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-26 12:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ih9a8kliiq5oenepvfvgndeboh96q93tj5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #894171 |
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 00:42:38 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: >On 7/25/2025 1:12 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote: >> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" >>> <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote: >>>>> On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>> them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, >>>>>>> you fucking Lügner. >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased >>>>>> one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o >>>>>> >>>>>> Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes! >>>>> >>>>> The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and >>>>> watched. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and >>>> anti-ship drone mine arrays? >>> >>> LOL! >>> >>> The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up. >>> Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it >>> hit too fast, listed and capsized. >>> >>> Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch. >>> >>> I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a >>> boat properly. >> >> You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you? > >Good point. If they get into the crazy hands, well... They say we need >to nuke to perhaps help bring about the great event from some religious >prophecy or something? Yikes! Crazy hands like Israel or the united states?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | x <x@x.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-26 14:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1063i60$2j2kb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #894171 |
On 7/26/25 00:42, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 7/25/2025 1:12 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote: >> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" >>> <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote: >>>>> On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>> them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, >>>>>>> you fucking Lügner. >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased >>>>>> one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o >>>>>> >>>>>> Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes! >>>>> >>>>> The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat >>>>> and >>>>> watched. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and >>>> anti-ship drone mine arrays? >>> >>> LOL! >>> >>> The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up. >>> Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it >>> hit too fast, listed and capsized. >>> >>> Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch. >>> >>> I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a >>> boat properly. >> >> You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you? > > Good point. If they get into the crazy hands, well... They say we need > to nuke to perhaps help bring about the great event from some religious > prophecy or something? Yikes! This is devoid of theology. With summum bonum and summum malum definitions of deity that would generally not be a good thing (it would tend toward summum malum). The grim reaper is grim and billions of people do regularly progress to degeneration and death, but being able to resurrect into an afterlife may be something different from various forms of destruction either great or small.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-27 10:22 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1rg4jil.1ubdrw412leignN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #894171 |
Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/25/2025 1:12 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" > >> <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote: > >>>> On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > >>>>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for > >>>>>>> them. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, > >>>>>> you fucking Lügner. > >>>>> > >>>>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased > >>>>> one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o > >>>>> > >>>>> Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes! > >>>> > >>>> The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and > >>>> watched. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and > >>> anti-ship drone mine arrays? > >> > >> LOL! > >> > >> The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up. > >> Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it > >> hit too fast, listed and capsized. > >> > >> Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch. > >> > >> I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a > >> boat properly. > > > > You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you? > > Good point. If they get into the crazy hands, well... They say we need > to nuke to perhaps help bring about the great event from some religious > prophecy or something? Yikes! Any hand wanting to hold nukes is crazy, by definition, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-27 13:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <10662lq$356k6$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #894184 |
On 7/27/2025 1:22 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7/25/2025 1:12 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" >>>> <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote: >>>>>> On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>>>> them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, >>>>>>>> you fucking Lügner. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased >>>>>>> one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes! >>>>>> >>>>>> The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and >>>>>> watched. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and >>>>> anti-ship drone mine arrays? >>>> >>>> LOL! >>>> >>>> The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up. >>>> Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it >>>> hit too fast, listed and capsized. >>>> >>>> Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch. >>>> >>>> I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a >>>> boat properly. >>> >>> You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you? >> >> Good point. If they get into the crazy hands, well... They say we need >> to nuke to perhaps help bring about the great event from some religious >> prophecy or something? Yikes! > > Any hand wanting to hold nukes is crazy, by definition, MAD?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | x <x@x.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-26 13:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1063f88$1i83f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #894162 |
On 7/25/25 13:12, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:41:58 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" >> <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 6/20/2025 3:13 PM, Siri Cruz wrote: >>>> On 20/6/25 12:07, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for >>>>>>> them. >>>>>> >>>>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, >>>>>> you fucking Lügner. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased >>>>> one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh. ;^o >>>>> >>>>> Israel bombed a North Korean reactor a while back? Yikes! >>>> >>>> The shipfree Ukraine navy sank the DPRK cruiser as Kim Some Guy sat and >>>> watched. >>>> >>> >>> Underwater drone navy mixed with ballistic anti ship missiles and >>> anti-ship drone mine arrays? >> >> LOL! >> >> The cruiser was being launched and the engineers flubbed the set up. >> Instead of the ship sliding smoothly into the water and floating, it >> hit too fast, listed and capsized. >> >> Brand new ship. Sunk itself at launch. >> >> I don't think we need to fear much from people who can't even launch a >> boat properly. > > You don't want to take risks with nukes, do you? > > Jan Isn't ANY government having nukes a risk? Why trust any of them? There are a bunch of countries that have nuclear power but undergo NNPT verification and accounting because they, do not want to incinerate millions of women and children with nuclear weapons.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-30 22:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <103vmab$2kq4l$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #893329 |
On 6/16/25 2:38 AM, Governor Swill wrote: > But you believe Albert Speer. > > ALBERT SPEER!! > > <laughs and points> If we measure the accuracy of what Speer's Jewish enemies have been saying about him (all after his death by the way), with the degree of accuracy of Israelis' comments and "proofs" about Iran, I'd throw away anything that Jews have blabbered about him, including your "laughs and points." Some stuff have changed about how Jews are viewed, if you didn't notice. I think nobody will ever believe their words.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-18 09:49 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mbf98mF4kotU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #893315 |
Am Sonntag000015, 15.06.2025 um 21:58 schrieb OrigInfoJunkie: > They didn't have an atomic bomb. The program was stopped in 1942, > according to Albert Speer. Albert Speer was a top Nazi, too. These would lie to whatever question you ask. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web