Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #866171 > unrolled thread

Re: New papers: SR versus ...

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: New papers: SR versus ... Fabio Brambilla <oaab@llbaboaa.am> - 2022-12-14 17:53 +0000
    Re: New papers: SR versus ... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-14 13:44 -0600

#866171 — Re: New papers: SR versus ...

beda pietanza wrote:

> II mostly agree with you on the incompatibly of SR/GR Even more, it is
> impossible to construct a math or a geometric model that apply  to all
> laws of physics.

so true indeed. The GR is a second order, SR a first order. I never saw 
the reduction of GR to SR. They say it exists. Take the GR equation and 
reduce it to gamma etc of SR. They can't. What they do is the opposite. 
They calculated the SR and the GR part separately, adding them together to 
get the result. This is it. 

then Einstine, married his cousin, explains not much brain. Let's say you 
do it once, by mistake, but you won't take the bitch as in wive and 
husband. Disgraceful.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#866182

On 12/14/2022 11:53 AM, Fabio Brambilla wrote:

[...]


> then Einstine, married his cousin, explains not much brain. Let's say you
> do it once, by mistake, but you won't take the bitch as in wive and
> husband. Disgraceful.

This really isn't the place to discuss your family secrets.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web