Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #868194 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-01-14 19:15 -0800 |
| Last post | 2023-02-18 12:19 -0800 |
| Articles | 2 on this page of 22 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 19:15 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 21:02 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 22:15 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 22:48 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 00:19 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 00:44 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 01:03 -0800
Re: FoR whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-15 00:18 -0600
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 11:47 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 12:37 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 14:41 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 22:56 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-17 12:24 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-17 13:36 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 13:52 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 21:27 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-20 09:23 -0800
Re: FoR Y A <y000000000000@ya.ee> - 2023-02-18 12:23 -0800
Re: FoR whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-15 00:16 -0600
Re: FoR Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2023-01-16 16:51 -0800
Re: FoR Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 22:32 -0800
Re: FoR Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 12:19 -0800
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-17 22:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fe715d1d-577f-49f5-a1a5-3e5cbfa89aben@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #868194 |
Save whales, sure no-one cares to save spam from FBI, CIA, Mi6, police drag net garbage that floods sci.math and sci.physics everyday. I have kindly asked President Biden to kindly remove this drag net spam from all of sci.math and sci.physics and leave them as spam free zones. Our Whale Animals Can a Trump tariff fine, Like the tariff of a Macron French wine, Show us how crazy is the world sign, When you have a crazy USA president time, Who pines about his hair line, More than he cares about 1,500 whales slaughtered by Japan crime. b . $ . .... d * * $ . .ze$$$$$$$$be.. ^b ^L 4F $ $ e$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$e "L $ b $ J% .$$$$$$$$$$$$$P**""** 3r'L $ $ 4F "*$$$$$$$$*" *.$ 3 $ $ *$$$$$" ^$'r'$P d" ^$$$" ^$$ $F4F $$$ "$r*bP $$$F "4$" $$$$ ^" $$$$b ..eeeed$$$$$$$$eeee... *$$$$b. .ze$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$be.. '$$$$$$bee..e$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$bc 3$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$c "*$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$r ^""""$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$e.. P "$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$bee.z@" ^*$$$$$$$$*""" """"**$$$$$$$$$$$$$" ^"*$$$" ""*$$$$$$*" ""**eeec............eee@**"" Gilo94' """""""""""""" z$ z$$F d$$$ $$$$$ J$$$$$ $$$$$$ .$$$$$$ $$$$$$$b $$$$$$$$$c J$$$$$$$$$$$c $$$$ "$$$$$$$$$. $$$$P "*$$$$$" .ze$$$$$bc .$$$$F z$$$$$$$$$$$$$b $$$$$ .e$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. $$$$$ z$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$""$$$$ 4$$$$$F .$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$r $$$$$$$ z$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$c e$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ '$$$$$$$c .d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$b d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ *$$$$$$$$r d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Gilo94' .-------------'```'----......,,__ _, | `'`'`'`'-.,.__ .'( | `'--._.' ) | `'-.< \ .-'`'-. -. `\ \ -.o_. _ _,-'`\ | ``````''--.._.-=-._ .' \ _,,--'` `-._( (^^^^^^^^`___ '-. | \ __,,,...--' ` ````````` `'--..___\ |` jgs `-.,' Newsgroups: sci.physics and sci.math Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 07:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: why we especially need whales to exist //SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, series 2, 2019 From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium...@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 14:32:55 +0000 why the whales are so important for the oceans-- isomers of CO2 //SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, series 2, 2019 Chemistry of carbon dioxide in Old Chemistry thought that CO2 from fossil fuel burning is the same CO2 that animals and plants breathe in and breathe out. Old Chemistry is wrong, for the CO2 that living organisms need to stay alive is a different isomer (the bonding of carbon with two oxygen atoms have different geometries) from the CO2 that is produced through burning. The fossil fuel CO2 is a toxic poison to plants and animals. So the best CO2 source in the oceans is the large animals. If you remove animals from ocean, and remove enough of them, you kill off the plants of the ocean also. This idea applies on land also. The plants of terrestrial life, need their large animals for Animal-CO2. AP Cranial-rectally inverted. Eric Francis, George Witte, St. Martin's Press Depriving a village somewhere, of an idiot. jfderry , JF Derry Telanthropus brains plugged into Africanthropus body James Kibo Parry James Kibo Parry James Kibo Parry On Tuesday, December 17, 2019 at 2:27:06 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: >"..as smart as the average tunicate" why Jason Herrmann and Dartmouth College (Hanover High School math is brighter than the College math) physics departments has lights turned off, but Harvard's Dr.Hau needs to turn the light off-- Quantum Entanglement verified 1- Kibo Parry Moroney, is it your opinion that Dr. John Baez is a math jackarse that cannot tell the difference from a ellipse and oval as proven by AP (see proofs below) ?? And when confronted with the fact that the ellipse is only a cylinder cut, not a conic cut, the imbecile Baez tries to go out and redefine the ellipse-- I mean, Baez spends more time in making up fake names for himself than actually getting a paper cone and putting a Kerr lid into the cone and see for himself that it is a oval Newsgroups: sci.physics Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 00:28:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <421c6f56-7355-4ec6...@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups...@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.208.232.34; posting-account=jPnQ2goAAAA461y3QD0lbyw0oKeThma1 NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.208.232.34 Message-ID: <69d8bde6-bcb6-472f...@googlegroups.com> Subject: asshole From: noTthaTguY <abu.ku...@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:28:33 +0000 On Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 3:28:35 AM UTC-5, noTthaTguY wrote: > ellipses are ovals, but not all ovals are elipses, of course; > just grab a dictionary, asshole > On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 7:17:05 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Agreed. > So, kibo Parry Moroney, you agree, but which is worse a idiot like you who thinks 938 is 12% short of 945 which even Dr. John Baez would Agree is wrong. why Jason Herrmann and Dartmouth College (Hanover High School math is brighter than the College math) physics departments has lights turned off, but Harvard's Dr.Hau needs to turn the light off-- Quantum Entanglement verified 1- Kibo Parry Moroney, is it your opinion that Ken Ribet is a math jackarse that cannot tell the difference from a ellipse and oval as proven by AP (see proofs below) ?? On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 7:17:05 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Agreed. > 1-AMS, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet, Robert L. Bryant, David Vogan, Eric M. Friedlander, they all love money more than the truth of math and science-- ellipse is never a conic section why Jason Herrmann and Dartmouth College (Hanover High School math is brighter than the College math) physics departments has lights turned off, but Harvard's Dr.Hau needs to turn the light off-- Quantum Entanglement verified I mean think of it, down the street from Dartmouth College is Hanover High School and anyone of the many bright students at Hanover High School can take a Euclid plane geometry proof that the ellipse is never a conic but is the oval, and walk into a Dartmouth College math classroom where the nitwit math professor is teaching the conic slant cut is a ellipse, when it never was. Yet here the Hanover High School student has more brains in math than the nitwit Dartmouth College math professor. #21 Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Quantum Entanglement was shown on NOVA in January 2019 with Austrian physicists at a mountain telescope gathering data. NOVA tried to explain Quantum Entanglement, but the below probably does a better job of explaining. Especially explaining to High School students what is going on, and why. A much easier and nicer experiment proving Quantum Entanglement and explaining why it exists; the mechanism behind it; is Harvard's Dr. Hau slow light experiments, once the laser light is turned off. Cover Picture is my photo of a Google search of terms "slow light BEC". Length: 21 pages ,_ o / //\, \>>| \\, #55 Earth axis tilt of 23 degrees came 66 million years ago along with Mediterranean Sea//geology series book 3 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Earth's axis tilt of 23 degrees came late in life for planet Earth some 66 million years ago when a asteroid bolide hit Earth, that caused not only the dinosaur extinction but carved out the Mediterranean Sea and moved the Europe Asian Laurasia supercontinent of Pangaea in plate tectonics. We have overwhelming proof of this axis tilt from 0 degrees to 23 degrees only in K-T boundary, for we have evidence that all the continents had living plants and animals which just could not be if the 23degree tilt had existed from Cambrian to Cretaceous. Australia alone since it was at the South Pole for much of its life yet still abundant in fossils that could only live in a warm climate. Cover picture of me circa 1993, pointing at the Mediterranean Sea of Europe. Length: 55 pages 1 customer review Top Reviews Jason Herrmann 1.0 out of 5 starsWaste of money and brain cells November 16, 2019 A complete and utter load of BS. Helpful Comment Report abuse See all 1 customer reviews Write a customer review Half a bubble off plumb. Has a one-way ticket on the Disoriented Express. Has an IQ one lower than it takes to grunt. Rusty Tavek AUK Rusty Tavek AUK Rusty Tavek Divides 3 into 7, and gets a even whole number. jfderry , JF Derry Has his solar panels aimed at the moon. Has it floored in neutral. Has only one chopstick in the chowmein. Has signs on both ears saying "Space for Rent." Has the attention span of an overripe grapefruit. Has the mental agility of a soap dish. Hasn't got all his china in the cupboard. He writes blank checks on a closed account. kibo James Parry kibo James Parry kibo James Parry He's really into himself. His head is up his arse. He's so dense, light bends around him. His phone doesn't quite reach his desk. Eric Francis, George Witte, St. Martin's Press His wipers don't touch the glass. High relative humidity. He's lost in a fog. His antenna doesn't pick up all the channels. Earle Jones Earle Jones Earle Jones Earle Jones His brain was sold separately and they were out of stock. His elevator is stuck between floors. His golf bag does not contain a full set of irons. His jack can't get the car off the ground. His head whistles in a cross wind. His mind is on vacation but his mouth is working overtime. I don't know what you are talking about, honestly. It must be frustrating to be sure you are right and so completely unable to say how or why. You pinhead think if you find it in wikipedia it must be true. Duhr. I suggest you do some research. It's hard to believe you are this dumb. Pay attention. Science is about reality, not imagination. What you describe here has more to do with stamp collecting than it does science. It's great how the anonymity of the internet allows fools the freedom to express the depths of their foolishness. Present your proof, dumbarse. Where is this extensive experimental data? Why do you think it is that nobody can find it? Do you think they are hiding it from us? Why would they do that? Did I characterize your argument accurately? ,_ o / //\, \>>| \\, I have to ask which Jason Herrman is this? For there is one at Penn Univ in anthropology, archaeology dept. One in Stanford as physics student. Or, another Jason Herrmann?? And why so many people see the Internet not as a place to learn and grow, but a place to dis people. What is this modern day hate spew with the Internet?? Do some people get their "rocks off" by dissing other people and their work? __| \ / |__ _ o ___\o \o | o/ o/___ o _ /\ /) | ( \ /o\ / ) | (\ /\ ___|_\______ _____/_|__ Kibo Parry Moroney, is it your opinion that Dr. Terence Tao is a math basketcase that cannot tell the difference from a ellipse and oval as proven by AP starting 2016, ellipse is a cylinder cut, never a conic (see proofs below) ?? On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 7:17:05 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Agreed. > King of Science --AP--what we throw out of Old Math as fakery// TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 4 First an aside for this is in the probability and statistics of Junior year College #5 HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 5 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV. Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles. Length: 16 pages List of Topics that is Fake Math or Irrelevant Minutiae First off, let me make a long list of what is not mathematics and was thrown out as either fakery junk mathematics or was pared down immensely for being rather minutiae or irrelevant or archaic and not worth the time in classroom education. 1) All of Old Logic such as the textbooks by Copi and Boole and Jevons with their messed up operators such as 10 OR 4 = 14, are thrown out onto the rubbish pile of shame. Set theory is thrown out completely, although we can use the word "set" to mean collection, group. All of Cantor set theory is phony baloney, not worth reading. 2) Rationals and Negative Numbers thrown out completely because the only true numbers are Decimal Grid Numbers. The Smallest set of numbers is the 10 Grid System with its infinitesimal being .1, and the entire collection of 10 Grid is 0, .1, .2, .3, . . , 9.9, 10.0 where .1 is microinfinity and 10 is macroinfinity. In 100 Grid the infinitesimal is .01, in 1000 Grid the infinitesimal is .001, etc etc. In such a true system of numbers, all the numbers are built by mathematical-induction. Not just one group of numbers-- counting, but all numbers from mathematical-induction. 3) Irrationals thrown out completely (ditto to Rationals and Negative numbers) 4) Reals thrown out completely (ditto) 5) Imaginary numbers and Complex numbers are b.s. and thrown out completely 6) Trigonometry pared down so much-- 90% thrown out, and no trigonometry ever enters Calculus. Only real use of trigonometry is when you have an angle and side, you can figure out the rest of the right triangle. But no, when you give true math to a gaggle of kooks, it is not long before they stretch true math way way out of its "zone of truth". And even fill up by 50% of calculus, when trig should never be in calculus. 7) Continuum and continuity thrown out as horrible fakery (in fact the Quantum Mechanic Physics of early 1900s had a better handle on the truth and reality of math with discrete space) 8) Topology is junk and a waste of time for many reasons such as continuum does not exist, and the fact that the idea of "bending" is not really ever a mathematical concept 9) Prime numbers are fakery for the Naturals never had division in the first place. The real true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers and they do not have a concept of "prime". The key evidence that primes were silly stupid error, was the fact that there never existed a "pattern for primes". And all of mathematics is a science of "pattern". If any part of mathematics has no pattern, is indication that such was a phony fake concept to start with. Below begins a write-up of Math topics all have pattern, if not, then not math. 10) Limit in Old Math was a horrible fakery, built by lowly idiots of math who wanted to get away from the smart students asking them-- stupid professor, come back here,-- how does a zero width rectangle even have interior area 11) Lobachevsky, Riemann geometries and all NonEuclidean geometries are fakery and a waste of time. Many math professors want to spice up their boring math, so they ventured way way off into the twilight-zone of math with NonEuclidean geometry, like eating the hottest peppers in the world for breakfast 12) Boole logic a horrid gaggle of monumental mistakes; one colossal error was their insane 10 OR 4 = 14. Boole was a monumental idiot of logic that he went to college to teach in a rainstorm without umbrella and when he got there, shivering, and no commonsense to switch into dry clothes, taught in rain soaked clothes then ordered his wife to give him cold bathes and wet his bed in order to fight pneumonia, and western culture puts such a logical misfit as a figurehead of logic 13) Galois Algebra of Group, Ring, Field a fakery and waste of time 14) Dimension stops at 3rd, and 3rd is the last and highest dimension possible, for there is no 4th or higher dimensions. 15) High School in Old Math spends too much time on quadratic equations with their negative numbers and imaginary-complex numbers when such never existed in the first place and where they violate a principle of algebra-- that an equation of algebra-- the right-side of the equation must always have a greater than zero number. So we throw out all quadratic equations of Old Math as fake math. 16) High School in Old Math spends too much time on teaching in geometry the congruence of SSS, ASA etc etc and we should pare that back somewhat, as excess teaching of a tiny minor concept. 17) Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations are now seen as superfluous when all functions are polynomials 18) Graph theory-- 90% worthless for it is based on the fakery of continuum 19) Probability and Statistics theory now becomes a part of Sigma Error in New Math, the Old Math Probability and Statistics theory were wastrel and thrown out for it is based on a continuum. We keep Probability and Statistics in new math but revise and overhaul it completely, especially the definition of Probability. 20) We definitely throw out all Old Math Calculus textbooks as mostly propaganda, based on the silly Limit and the Continuum 21) We throw out the Euclidean Axioms of Geometry and start anew, with axioms based on Physics as geometry truth 22) Fractal theory totally junk and a waste-- uses ill-defined infinity 23) Vector Calculus (mind you not vectors versus scalars), Chaos theory, Complex Analysis, utter junk and waste of time since polynomial theory covers all functions 24) Differential geometry, Measure theory fakery since they never had the correct numbers of math, and they had the fakery continuum 25) We throw out all the Apollonius conic sections because he misidentified the ellipse. The ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic section and the oval is the slant cut of the cone, never the ellipse. We replace the entire conic sections by the AP theory of axes of symmetry using Decimal Grid Numbers for algebra and strip-wavelength-geometry axioms. This list is ongoing, and is a bulletin-board of Teaching True Mathematics for Sophomore College year. To show students what math to avoid as a total fake and waste of time. I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium AP- the King of Science #14 AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section//ellipse-oval series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone. Length: 21 pages #15 Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition// ellipse-oval series, book 2 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) In November of 2019, I was challenged into giving a well-defined definition of Oval, since Old Math Geometry never provided a well defined definition of Oval. I dutifully well defined this important class of geometry figures. And whilst completing that task of a well defined definition, I found a second proof that the ellipse is never a conic section, always a cylinder section, for it is the oval that is the conic section at a slant cut. This second proof is a mere one paragraph long and is a Projective Geometry proof that the slant cut in a cone is a oval, never the ellipse. Caution: I am worried that ascii-art is messed up and so this book is in rtf file not pdf. Cover Picture: a cone and cylinder on a cutting board ready to be cut at a slant, and ready to view in silhouette form. Length: 34 pages why does Jason Herrmann, Kibo Parry Moroney, Dan Christensen want to kill WHALES, if any?? //rating of Kindle book//Earth axis tilt of 23 degrees came 66 million years ago// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES// Kindle Edition // Jason Herrmann, Confused as a baby in a topless bar On Tuesday, December 10, 2019 at 5:04:12 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > I ate.. "..and it was delicious!" AP writes: how repulsive, when the world has the Right Whale and Blue Whale on verge of extinction. On Tuesday, December 10, 2019 at 11:02:33 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote: > >There will be a price to pay. You will be relentlessly and publicly exposed for AP writes: Whales do not need any price to pay, they have a right to live on Earth far greater than Dan, ever has. And Dan is a bully that needs Canadian jail time. And Kibo Parry Moroney needs USA jail sentence. why does Jason Herrmann want to kill WHALES, if any?? //rating of Kindle book//Earth axis tilt of 23 degrees came 66 million years ago// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES// Kindle Edition // Jason Herrmann, Confused as a baby in a topless bar why does Jason Herrmann want to kill WHALES, if any?? //rating of Kindle book//Earth axis tilt of 23 degrees came 66 million years ago// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES// Kindle Edition Jason Herrmann, Confused as a baby in a topless bar why does Jason Herrmann want to kill WHALES, if any?? //rating of Kindle book//Earth axis tilt of 23 degrees came 66 million years ago// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES// Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium 1 customer review Top Reviews Jason Herrmann 1.0 out of 5 starsWaste of money and brain cells November 16, 2019 A complete and utter load of BS. Helpful Comment Report abuse See all 1 customer reviews Write a customer review ,_ o / //\, \>>| \\, Newsgroups: sci.physics and sci.math Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 07:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: why we especially need whales to exist //SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, series 2, 2019 From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium...@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 14:32:55 +0000 why the whales are so important for the oceans-- isomers of CO2 //SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, series 2, 2019 Chemistry of carbon dioxide in Old Chemistry thought that CO2 from fossil fuel burning is the same CO2 that animals and plants breathe in and breathe out. Old Chemistry is wrong, for the CO2 that living organisms need to stay alive is a different isomer (the bonding of carbon with two oxygen atoms have different geometries) from the CO2 that is produced through burning. The fossil fuel CO2 is a toxic poison to plants and animals. So the best CO2 source in the oceans is the large animals. If you remove animals from ocean, and remove enough of them, you kill off the plants of the ocean also. This idea applies on land also. The plants of terrestrial life, need their large animals for Animal-CO2. #64 Science Council Ruling Earth//Paradise supernation corralling Bad Guy nations//series 2 (AP running for USA president) Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) ,_ o / //\, \>>| \\, Australopithecus brain fitted into Paranthropus body Dan Christensen, Dan Christensen Graecopithecus brain evolved from Sahelanthropus body kibo James Parry kibo James Parry kibo James Parry Ardipithecus body coupled to a Australopithecus brain Rusty Tavek AUK Rusty Tavek AUK Rusty Tavek Lucy brain housed in a Otzi body jfderry, jf Derry, JF Derry, lunatic mind housed in a lunatic J F Derry (author) CroMagnum body enhanced by Floresiensis brain Eric Francis, George Witte, St. Martin's Press Improved Neanderthalensis brains from Heidelbergensis Rusty Tavek AUK Rusty Tavek AUK Rusty Tavek Rusty Tavek Telanthropus brains plugged into Africanthropus body kibo James Parry kibo James Parry kibo James Parry Palaeanthropus thinking by the time of Cyphanthropus jfderry, jf Derry, JF Derry, lunatic mind housed in a lunatic J F Derry (author) Tchadanthropus mind by the time of Atlanthropus Earle Jones Earle Jones Earle Jones Kenyanthropus body propelled by a Praeanthropus mind Eric Francis, George Witte, St. Martin's Press Pithecanthropus body propelled by Sinanthropus mind __| \ / |__ _ o ___\o \o | o/ o/___ o _ /\ /) | ( \ /o\ / ) | (\ /\ ___|_\______ _____/_|__
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-18 12:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f4f8732b-c611-435d-988c-5bfc5271d1d5n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #868194 |
Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Roger Penrose, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science. 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2. 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle" 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron. On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 9:15:04 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez, > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita > > Arthur B. McDonald > > Francois Englert > > Saul Perlmutter > > Brian P. Schmidt > > Adam G. Riess > > Makoto Kobayashi > > Toshihide Maskawa_ > > Yoichiro Nambu_ > > John C. Mather > > George F. Smoot > > Roy J. Glauber_ > > David J. Gross > > Hugh David Politzer > > Frank Wilczek > > Raymond Davis Jr. _ > > Masatoshi Koshiba_ > > Riccardo Giacconi_ > > Gerardus 't Hooft > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_ > > Jerome I. Friedman > > Henry W. Kendall_ > > Richard E. Taylor_ > > Carlo Rubbia > > Simon van der Meer_ > > William Alfred Fowler_ > > Kenneth G. Wilson_ > > James Watson Cronin_ > > Val Logsdon Fitch_ > > Sheldon Lee Glashow > > Steven Weinberg_ > > . > > . > > little fishes > > . > > . > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu > > more and more layers of error thinking physics > > . > > . > > Edward Witten > > John Baez > > Brian Greene > > Lisa Randall > > Alan H. Guth > > Michael E. Brown > > Konstantin Batygin > > Ben Bullock > > Larry Harson > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views > > None at all - he was a raving nutter. > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater > > > > > > #2-1, 137th published book > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > > > > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me. > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to. > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory. > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism. > > Length: 64 pages > > > > Product details > > • File Size : 790 KB > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020 > > • Word Wise : Enabled > > • Print Length : 64 pages > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > • Language: : English > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY > > • Lending : Enabled > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store) > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads > > > > #2-2, 145th published book > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2 > > Kindle Edition > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education. > > > > Product details > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020 > > • Language: : English > > • File size : 682 KB > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > • Word Wise : Enabled > > • Print length : 78 pages > > • Lending : Enabled > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store) > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books) > > > > #2-3, 146th published book > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3 > > Kindle Edition > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future. > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory. > > > > Product details > > • ASIN : B08RK33T8V > > • Publication date : December 28, 2020 > > • Language : English > > • File size : 794 KB > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > • Word Wise : Enabled > > • Print length : 123 pages > > • Lending : Enabled > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store) > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books) > > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4 > > Kindle Edition > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics. > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me. > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics. > > > > Product details > > • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM > > • Publication date : October 19, 2021 > > • Language : English > > • File size : 1035 KB > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > • Word Wise : Enabled > > • Print length : 386 pages > > • Lending : Enabled > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store) > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books) > > > > > > > > #2-5, 174th published book > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition > > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me). > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole. > > > > Product details > > • ASIN : B09TKL4HMC > > • Publication date : February 27, 2022 > > • Language : English > > • File size : 675 KB > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > • Word Wise : Enabled > > • Print length : 41 pages > > • Lending : Enabled > > > > > > > > #2-6, 177th published book > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom. > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture. > > > > Product details > > • ASIN : B09VFH9QST > > • Publication date : March 12, 2022 > > • Language : English > > • File size : 823 KB > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled > > • Print length : 74 pages > > • Lending : Enabled > > > > > > > > #2-7, 178th published book > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition) > > > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy. > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED. > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave. > > > > Product details > > • ASIN : B09W58XGDW > > • Publication date : March 21, 2022 > > • Language : English > > • File size : 824 KB > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled > > • Screen Reader : Supported > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled > > • Word Wise : Enabled > > • Print length : 66 pages > > • Lending : Enabled > > > > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web