Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics Subject: Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 11:17:24 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 71 Message-ID: <67F173B4.DC@ix.netcom.com> References: <67EF682D.135A@ix.netcom.com> <67F01AE8.5A1A@ix.netcom.com> <67F04BF8.F9C@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 20:17:17 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7cc60f294b676e20d2601203661d6e32"; logging-data="3040446"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ulU5i/6pcCTqbsO/J91MtEPU7wu2H+J0=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:R/riYen6qdnbXxS1xUx9LXkVJUU= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250405-6, 04/05/2025), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:662419 sci.physics:892178 The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Stephen Hawking once asked: > > > > > > Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? > > > > > > If Stephen Hawking would like an answer > > > to that question, has he ever consider > > > asking a woman that question? > > > > > > I don't mean a woman scientist.. > > > > > > i mean, just any woman. > > > > > > Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is > > > entitled to know the answer? > > > > > > Is he Moses? > > > > I was under the impression that Stephen Hawking was an atheist. > > > > But he refers to the universe as a person, a being, a self that feels > > "bother".. > > > > Why is Stephen Hawking soooo bothered by a bothered universe? > > > > Mother Nature? > > > > Is something bothering her? > > > > Yous science guys make no sense... > > > > It appears that both Einstein and Hawking are using Philosphy (bother) > to try > to understand the universe... > > and that the universe is some hot and bothered irrational woman. > > Yous science people are certaintly not going to get the answers by being > ...rational. I mean, I observe the Earth and it doesn't appear rational to me.... doesn't that ...bother...you? Using rational means in a irrational world sounds STUPID to me. Luckly, only a small percentage of the people on earth are rational. There is NO scientific basis for a rational world... but there is a scientific basis for a irratioan; world. Don't let that bother you. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.