Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.atheism Subject: Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 11:51:35 -0700 Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: <66786EB7.1133@ix.netcom.com> References: <666895F5.7D1B@ix.netcom.com> <6669D9EE.766B@ix.netcom.com> <666A76B3.B61@ix.netcom.com> <666DFF1A.5A4B@ix.netcom.com> <6675AE52.6C4C@ix.netcom.com> <667705B7.7076@ix.netcom.com> <14je7jt13drk2shj95kideg6q30m9vbcg3@4ax.com> <66779B35.3B95@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="1681209"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 240623-4, 06/23/2024), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:654433 sci.physics:888240 alt.atheism:3383467 Attila < wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:49:09 -0700, The Starmaker > in alt.atheism with message-id > <66779B35.3B95@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >Attila < wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:11:19 -0700, The Starmaker > >> in alt.atheism with message-id > >> <667705B7.7076@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Attila < wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:46:10 -0700, The Starmaker > >> >> in alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> <6675AE52.6C4C@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >Attila < wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 13:52:42 -0700, The Starmaker > >> >> >> in alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> <666DFF1A.5A4B@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Attila < wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >There is only one God, the God who made the tree that isn't a tree. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> How do you know? Perhaps there are a bunch of gods. Or not > >> >> >> >> and trees developed by an entirely different process. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >The Code reads: 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >There is only one earth > >> >> >> >There is only one heavens > >> >> >> >There is only one beginning > >> >> >> >There is only one God. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> What code? > >> >> > > >> >> >The Code! > >> >> > > >> >> >The Code reads: 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the > >> >> >earth.' > >> >> > > >> >> >All the answers to questions of the universe are answered by simply > >> >> >deciphering The Code. > >> >> > > >> >> >Here is The Code: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' > >> >> > >> >> That is not a code - it's a belief. > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >Like for example...it can be clearly seen that before God created the > >> >> >heavens and the earth, > >> >> > >> >> Or not. > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> >that He appears to be enclosed or surrounded by...something else. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >It's in The Code! > >> >> > >> >> So you say. > >> > > >> >It's not what I say...it's in The Code! You have to First decipher The Code... > >> > > >> >The first word of The Code reads...'"In...." > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >in > >> >/in/ > >> >preposition > >> > > >> > expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else. > >> > > >> >https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+in > >> > > >> > > >> >I'll give you another example of deciphering The Code. > >> > > >> > > >> >The Code reads: "....'God created the heavens and the earth.'" > >> > > >> > > >> >That means the Earth and the universe were created 'at the same time', not as the 'scientific community' claim that > >> >earth was created 5 billion years later. > >> > > >> >5 billions later does not make sense, at the 'same time' makes more sense. > >> > > >> > > >> >It's in The Code! > >> > > >> Garbage. > > > > > >Well, do agree then that the word "In" is defined: "expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else."???? > > "expressing the situation of something that is or appears to > be enclosed or surrounded by something else." > > From Google. Well Yes, that was the link I posted https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+in But do you agree then that the word "In" is defined: "expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else."??? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.