Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.atheism Subject: Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 08:29:27 -0700 Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: <663CEBD7.3857@ix.netcom.com> References: <66350E8E.7D2F@ix.netcom.com> <6638F8B4.4C4C@ix.netcom.com> <66393269.4913@ix.netcom.com> <6639B5E6.4553@ix.netcom.com> <663B211D.EF4@ix.netcom.com> <0iim3jp6emvpogsg1obp5bgppk8798f2v6@4ax.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="715431"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 240509-2, 05/09/2024), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:653531 sci.physics:887340 alt.atheism:3372369 Attila < wrote: > > On Tue, 07 May 2024 23:52:13 -0700, The Starmaker > in alt.atheism with message-id > <663B211D.EF4@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >Attila < wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, 06 May 2024 22:02:30 -0700, The Starmaker > >> in alt.atheism with message-id > >> <6639B5E6.4553@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Okay, back to my reverse engineering... > >> > > >> >you agree there was some verification for an > >> >earth and the heavens (you call it the universe) > >> > >> They exist as proven by any number of verifiable and > >> repeatable experiments. Since they provide the structure > >> for our lives it would be a bit difficult to exist without > >> them. > >> > >> And no, I am not getting into a dialog about whether or not > >> we exist. > >> > >> > > >> >'In the beginning, God > >> >created the heavens and > >> >the earth.' > >> > >> You keep repeating a meaningless quote from an unverified > >> source as if is relevant. Why is that? > >> > >> Since it is unverified it is useless. > >> > >> > > >> > > >> >Next in reverse engineering is > >> > > >> >"created" > >> >'...created the heavens and > >> >the earth.' > >> > > >> > > >> >Do you agree the universe/heavens and the earth > >> >was... > >> >'created'??? > >> > >> Not necessarily. And especially I have no idea how such > >> possible creation took place. Those are things that are not > >> yet known. > > > >you wrote: > >"creation took place" > > "Possible creation" I do not concede such creation > occurred. > > > > > > >That means you agree creation took place. > > Wrong. See above. > > > > > > >What's next on my reverse engineering list? > > > > > >You already agreed on earth, heavens, and created... > > Nope. Nice try at putting words in my mouth. > > > > > > >Next is God...God created > >the heavens and the earth. > > If anything created anything the evidence indicates it could > have been space hamsters, beings from another dimension, or > a bored teenager with magical skills. Or something else. > > IOW, there is no evidence to support anything. > > I can keep repeating I have yet to see any valid evidence > supporting the existence of any god as long as you insist on > referring to one. > > > > > > >What does the word "God" mean to you? How would you define the word...God? > > 1. > (in Christianity and other monotheistic religions) the > creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral > authority; the supreme being. I asked you..."God" mean to you?, you define the word...God? and You picked Your Christian God. So, you are a die hard self-hating Christian! Typical atheists. Your girlfriend Christian too, right? It's okay, Charles Darnwin is a self-hating Christian too! But I had prefer if you had gave me YOUR definition of God, not Google's. Everyone here wants to know what exactly is YOUR definition of God... teach me. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.