Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #885708

Re: I found an old script

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: I found an old script
Date 2024-03-10 14:26 -0700
Organization To protect and to server
Message-ID <65EE259A.4AB8@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <65EE07B2.595A@ix.netcom.com> <65EE11FC.7615@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Now, if you have watched
movies like...
Pirates of Silicon Valley
Steve Jobs movies
The Billion Dollar Code
The Story of Spotify

you know you are suppose to
yell, scream at software writers
to get stuff and work out of them.

you gotta do the samething to ChatGPT.

DON'T LET HIM BREATHE!

DON'T LET HIM EAT

DON'T LET HIM SLEEP!

That's the way to handle
software writers and programers.

BEAT THEM WITH A STICK!!!!


The NERVE of ChatGPT pointing
to me a link that I should read????

A lazy bum like it's programmer.





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> At one point
> of ChatGPT's
> debuging
> ChatGPT suggested
> to me to read
> some documentation,
> and even pointed a
> link...
> "I said to myself,
> NO, YOU FUCKING READ IT!!!"
> 
> and I went to the link,
> copy and paste it ALL to
> ChatGPT, and he quickly
> read it and went on
> fixin it.
> 
> and all along the way..
> I kept reposting to him
> his updated script
> and told him to
> "insert the solutions"
> into the script
> himself.
> 
> You know how ChatGPT is..
> he gives you a couple lines
> of code and tells you
> to insert it into
> the script.
> 
> I said "NO, YOU FUCKING PUT IT IN!!!"
> (not out loud of course,
> (if he hears me he
> cops an attitude)
> 
> And he does put it in.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > I found an old
> > out-dated
> > script
> > on Github.
> >
> > The only problem
> > was it didn't work.
> >
> > So, I quickly
> > gave it to
> > ChatGPT
> > to fix it for
> > me...
> > i didn't even
> > bother to see what
> > language it was in.
> >
> > Of course, Chatgpt
> > is big headed and says
> > it fixed it.
> > But when I ran it
> > it wasn't fixed.
> >
> > So, I gave Chatgpt
> > the error message
> > and Chatgpt said
> > "Okay. it's fixed now!
> >
> > But when I ran it
> > it wasn't fixed.
> >
> > So I kept
> > over and over again
> > the error messages
> > and Chatgpt said
> > "Okay. it's fixed now!
> >
> > But when I ran it
> > it wasn't fixed.
> >
> > So I kept
> > over and over again
> > the error messages
> > and Chatgpt said
> > "Okay. it's fixed now!
> >
> > But when I ran it
> > it wasn't fixed.
> >
> > So I kept
> > over and over again
> > the error messages
> > and Chatgpt said
> > "Okay. it's fixed now!
> >
> > But when I ran it
> > it wasn't fixed.
> >
> > So I kept
> > over and over again
> > the error messages
> > and Chatgpt said
> > "Okay. it's fixed now!
> >
> > Finally! It was
> > down to just a
> > single
> > 'synthax error'
> > and when I remove that,
> > the script WORKED!
> >
> > Now, the script is worth, thousand of dollars!
> >
> > Here is what I learned about
> > solving my own complex
> > programming problems
> > which I know I don't have the
> > answer to but I know I can eventually
> > find the answer, even if I know I
> > myself don't know the answer.
> >
> > You keep inputing
> > the problem
> > in your mind
> > over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again, even if you
> > know you don't have
> > the answer...
> > over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again,over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again, ...
> >
> > You don't try
> > to THINK of an
> > answer..
> >
> > You keep inputing
> > the problem
> > in your mind
> > over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again, even if you
> > know you don't have
> > the answer...
> > over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again,over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again, ...
> >
> > Don't bother
> > to try
> > to THINK of an
> > answer..
> >
> > just keep
> > inputing
> > the problem
> > in your mind
> > over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again, even if you
> > know you don't have
> > the answer...
> > over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again,over and over
> > again,
> > over and over
> > again, ...
> >
> > Like I did with Chatgpt.
> >
> > And all of a sudden
> > the Chatgpt within
> > me spurt out
> > The Answer.
> >
> > An Aha Moment!
> >
> > In other words, when I
> > wasn't thinking
> > about it...it was
> > still
> > running
> > the problem.
> >
> > Even ChatGPT
> > doesn't have the
> > answer right
> > away...and He has more
> > information than I do!
> >
> > Even Microsoft cannot
> > figure out how
> > ChatGPT comes up some
> > of it's answers.
> >
> > I would say..
> > there is an
> > Invisible Hand
> > at work.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

I found an old script The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-10 12:19 -0700
  Re: I found an old script The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-10 13:03 -0700
    Re: I found an old script The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-10 14:26 -0700

csiph-web