Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!/cd6lVY8Z/mQ7QUEKAKGKw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: A Theory of All
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 09:30:20 -0700
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID: <62827C1C.1E9B@ix.netcom.com>
References: <dc52f1d5-1be7-01ee-1411-102b4e65b4d1@diegidio.name> <t5ssn9$fq2$1@dont-email.me> <1ps1l7v.10mo79zcn4gvxN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="3244"; posting-host="/cd6lVY8Z/mQ7QUEKAKGKw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220516-6, 05/16/2022), Outbound message
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:852618

J. J. Lodder wrote:
> 
> Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> wrote:
> 
> > For the record.
> >
> >
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > Subject:      Re: A Theory of All
> > Date:         Mon, 16 May 2022 08:52:34 +0200
> > From:         Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name>
> > To:   hees@itp.uni-frankfurt.de
> >
> >
> > Beginners questions and other bullshit all over the place, but Jacob
> > Barandes and foundations of physics is "overly speculative".
> >
> > And I could even understand that, sort of: but that you don't allow me
> > to reply to Tom Roberts and his filth is simply unforgivable.
> >
> > You are totally part of the problem and of no solution ever. Be ashamed
> > of yourselves, you fucking frauds and enemies of humanity.
> >
> > Julio
> >
> >
> > On 14/05/2022 17:14, Hendrik van Hees wrote:
> > > Unfortunately your posting to sci.physics.research is not appropriate
> > > for the newsgroup, because it is not entirely clear what the statement
> > > is about and also seems to be overly speculative.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Hendrik van Hees.
> > > sci.physics.research co-moderator
> 
> [snip 'not entirely clear' material]
> 
> Yes, this is precisely why sci.physics.research was set up.
> It is also the reason why sci.physics.research
> does not contain the morasses of junk that you find
> in sci.physics and sci.physics.relativity
> 
> The moderators are doing an excellent job,
> 
> Jan

The only good moderator is a dead moderator.


> 
> --
> "We won't let the nutters steal usenet from us" (John Baez)
> 
> 

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.