Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 17:18:22 -0600
Message-ID: <618EF65D.616D@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:18:53 -0800
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: How many basic forces in nature are there?
References: <618AFBEC.2FAA@ix.netcom.com> <618C155D.4B3E@ix.netcom.com> <618D60E3.7ECC@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 211112-6, 11/12/2021), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 72
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-eXoLM4thJtxJAUMJIxykqsgjcZp8dN2PeHsMzu9Pr4s4EdXP/VQkveeNWv5W2A+GF0UNMzNJnkc6Wht!vab/6N0Fg/FbOqfbrkKL42XaljiCdjEvmfnopujdV1DVd03Z3xpL456+Tk+FrmFgvyxJi8YA8fr5!KelxfTT602c=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3641
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:566651 sci.physics:835573

https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=paul+davies+what%27s+eating+the+universe+and+is+there+something+magical+about+four+%28really+three%29


or
goto

Google Books

https://books.google.com/?hl=en&tab=wp


and insert this in the search bar: 

paul davies what's eating the universe and is there something magical about four (really three)



The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > How many basic forces in nature are there? 3 or 4??
> > >
> > > It has to be one or the other, but which one, 3 or 4?
> > >
> > > Unless of course you people don't know, then nevermind.
> > >
> > > My information sez there are only 3..and 4 is wrong.
> >
> > Now, let me elaborate on 'my sources'..
> >
> > it comes from a Regents Professor.
> >
> > a Regents Professor
> > The title Regents Professor serves as recognition of the highest academic merit and is awarded to
> > faculty members who have made a unique contribution to the quality of the University through distinguished
> > accomplishments in teaching scholarship, research or creative work.
> >
> > also, he is a theoretical physicist and cosmologist.
> >
> > And he sez, "In actual fact, there are only three forces."
> >
> > Now, I don't give a fuck what Google says or what 727,000,000 others think...
> >
> > I'm only interested in facts...not lemming science.
> >
> > Now, I repeat...those of yous who believe that there are only four  basic forces in nature are WRONG!
> >
> > How many basic forces in nature are there? Do I hear a 3 from any of yous????
> >
> > A factual 3? In actual fact, 3?
> >
> 
> Now imagine if you will, that if Stephen Hawking were alive today and he said..."In actual fact, there are only three forces." Would you believe him (regardless what Google claims)????
> 
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.