Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > sci.physics.research > #11639
| From | ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.research |
| Subject | Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector? |
| Date | 2024-08-08 07:02 +0000 |
| Organization | Stefan Ram |
| Message-ID | <vector-20240807201044@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> (permalink) |
| References | <cotangent-20240806233433@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <v8vbib$2fuke$1@dont-email.me> |
moderator jt wrote or quoted: >calculus. In this usage, these phrases describe how a vector (a.k.a >a rank-1 tensor) transforms under a change of coordintes: a tangent >vector (a.k.a a "contravariant vector") is a vector which transforms >the same way a coordinate position $x^i$ does, while a cotangent vector >(a.k.a a "covariant vector") is a vector which transforms the same way >a partial derivative operator $\partial / \partial x^i$ does. Yeah, that explanation is on the right track, but I got to add a couple of things. Explaining objects by their transformation behavior is classic physicist stuff. A mathematician, on the other hand, defines what an object /is/ first, and then the transformation behavior follows from that definition. You got to give it to the physicists---they often spot weird structures in the world before mathematicians do. They measure coordinates and see transformation behaviors, so it makes sense they use those terms. Mathematicians then come along later, trying to define mathematical objects that fit those transformation behaviors. But in some areas of quantum field theory, they still haven't nailed down a mathematical description. Using mathematical objects in physics is super elegant, but if mathematicians can't find those objects, physicists just keep doing their thing anyway! A differentiable manifold looks locally like R^n, and a tangent vector at a point x on the manifold is an equivalence class v of curves (in R^3, these are all worldlines passing through a point at the same speed). So, the tangent vector v transforms like a velocity at a location, not like the location x itself. (When one rotates the world around the location x, x is not changed, but tangent vectors at x change their direction.) A /cotangent vector/ at x is a linear function that assigns a real number to a tangent vector v at the same point x. The total differential of a function f at x is actually a covector that linearly approximates f at that point by telling us how much the function value changes with the change represented by vector v. When one defines the "canonical" (or "generalized") momentum as the derivative of a Lagrange function, it points toward being a covector. But I was confused because I saw a partial derivative instead of a total differential. But possibly this is just a coordinate representation of a total differential. So, broadly, it's plausible that momentum is a covector, but I struggle with the technical details and physical interpretation. What physical sense does it make for momentum to take a velocity and return a number? (Maybe that number is energy or action). (In the world of Falk/Ruppel ["Energie und Entropie", Springer, Berlin] it's just the other way round. There, they write "dE = v dp". So, here, the speed v is something that maps changes of momentum dp to changes of the energy dE. This immediately makes sense because when the speed is higher a force field is traveled through more quickly, so the same difference in energy results in a reduced transfer of momentum. So, transferring the same momentum takes more energy when the speed is higher. Which, after all, explains while the energy grows quadratic with the speed and the momentum only linearly.)
Back to sci.physics.research | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The momentum - a cotangent vector? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2024-08-07 06:54 +0000
Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-07 11:37 -0700
Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2024-08-08 07:02 +0000
Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector? Hendrik van Hees <hees@itp.uni-frankfurt.de> - 2024-08-08 07:49 +0000
Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-12-05 13:41 -0800
Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-08 11:00 +0000
Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-08 21:15 -0700
Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector? Hendrik van Hees <hees@itp.uni-frankfurt.de> - 2024-08-09 13:53 -0700
Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2024-08-10 06:16 +0000
csiph-web