Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: energy and mass Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 10:36:02 +0100 Lines: 71 Message-ID: References: <10nup5d$3c2s4$2@dont-email.me> <10o11j9$3pb4$1@dont-email.me> <10o6jb9$20j6f$1@dont-email.me> <10oc4qv$3s7dn$1@dont-email.me> <10ok1j9$2ecdb$1@dont-email.me> <2mg0rklvdovcug21sjs95pi6o18n9qrdsm@4ax.com> <10p1a7r$3a2h8$1@dont-email.me> <10p3t9u$a44n$2@dont-email.me> <10p5vh4$10avb$1@dont-email.me> <10pgpiv$mp47$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 8+BI+FogRsvhkCeTJwn7ewLZX2tAhTgOF4LanotBTwwkYLfrQa Cancel-Lock: sha1:t29yftA9UFlwGPt+sJXGV9i9x4g= sha256:Jh7j7cXb8XMb/AsFAKz8L+idIhJi/lhaI/5/mQFM7KI= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: de-DE In-Reply-To: <10pgpiv$mp47$1@dont-email.me> Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:670194 sci.electronics.design:741948 Am Donnerstag000019, 19.03.2026 um 13:18 schrieb Bill Sloman: ... >>>>>> E.g. I'm a proponent of 'Growing Earth' and 'abiogenic oil' and >>>>>> have spent a lot of time on these topics. >>>>>> >>>>>> And I'm pretty certain, that Earth does in fact grow and also know >>>>>> why. >>>>> >>>>> And I'm pretty certain that you are deceiving yourself. >>>>> >>>>>> But you can't even talk about these topics, because that would >>>>>> cause very harsh reactions. >>>>> >>>>> The continental drift theory took a long time to get accepted. You >>>>> do seem to be unaware of it. >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Wegener >>>> >>>> No, because I knew who Wegener was and how his theory worked. >>>> >>>> But I'm a proponent of the German geologist Ott-Christoph >>>> Hilgenberg, who invented 'Growing Earth' as addition to Wegner's >>>> continental drift theory. >>>> >>>> Both theories are quite similar, but have one main difference: >>>> >>>> plate tectonics(PT) assumes a constant size of the Earth and growing >>>> Earth (called GE here) assumes growth. >>>> >>>> So, PT needs something balancing the obvious spreading. PT calls >>>> this 'subduction'. >>>> >>>> But 'subduction is blatant nonsense for an large number of reasons. >>> >>> It happens at oceanic trenches, and is well documented. >> Subduction is a hypothesis. > > But a pretty well tested one. >> >> But it also blatant nonsense. It is actually the lie that plate >> tectonics depends on, hence cannot be questioned at all. >> >> But it is nonsense, however. >> >> Subduction would assume thing, which violate simple logic. >> >> For instance plate tectonics is based on the assumption, that Earth >> would NOT grow. That's why the obvious spreading needs something to >> balance that spreading and that is the alleged subduction. > > A growing earth violates the principle of the conservation of mass/ > energy. That doesn't make it inconcieveable, but it means that you need > very convincing evidence to support the idea, and that doesn't seem to > exist. Well, it would violate a certain priciple which is commonly called 'materialism'. This 'great materialistic metaparadigm' is encoded into what is called 'standard modell of QM' and belongs to the also fraudulent 'big-bang theory'. Now you seemingly want to forbid, what planet Earth actually does, because it would violate fraudulent laws??? TH ...