Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: energy and mass Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 10:08:18 +0100 Lines: 116 Message-ID: References: <10nup5d$3c2s4$2@dont-email.me> <10o11j9$3pb4$1@dont-email.me> <10o6jb9$20j6f$1@dont-email.me> <10oc4qv$3s7dn$1@dont-email.me> <10ok1j9$2ecdb$1@dont-email.me> <2mg0rklvdovcug21sjs95pi6o18n9qrdsm@4ax.com> <10p1a7r$3a2h8$1@dont-email.me> <10p3t9u$a44n$2@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net oFOLu5OIKp3kIi8ZBvjShAT5YXNunKKv5x+m6+0ieLH8C16+s/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:+br32CwLpwvRxUlFf+5mMEKzmUs= sha256:TI9SHltEiXHPvyQyW12ENCvixqgT2EIlZGrYc0y0nn8= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: de-DE, en-US In-Reply-To: <10p3t9u$a44n$2@dont-email.me> Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:669884 sci.electronics.design:741649 Am Samstag000014, 14.03.2026 um 16:02 schrieb Bill Sloman: ... >>> Society does have an interest in seeing it published - the patent >>> system was set up to encourage people to publish their inventions and >>> collect royalties from people who can exploit them. >> >> Well, publishing is usually the final step. >> >> But before you could publish something, you need to have something >> worth publishing. >> >> And that is difficult, if you do it all alone. > > Very few people do. I did. >>> I'm sure there a fat cats who are doing well, and don't want new >>> inventions to cut into their markets. The fossil carbon extraction >>> industry is precisely that sort of fat cat, and they'd be much >>> happier if science wasn't documenting the relentless progression of >>> anthropogenic global warming. They do spend a lot on climate change >>> denial propaganda, but they don't seem to have been all that >>> effective in shutting down research on the topic. >> >> E.g. I'm a proponent of 'Growing Earth' and 'abiogenic oil' and have >> spent a lot of time on these topics. >> >> And I'm pretty certain, that Earth does in fact grow and also know why. > > And I'm pretty certain that you are deceiving yourself. > >> But you can't even talk about these topics, because that would cause >> very harsh reactions. > > The continental drift theory took a long time to get accepted. You do > seem to be unaware of it. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Wegener No, because I knew who Wegener was and how his theory worked. But I'm a proponent of the German geologist Ott-Christoph Hilgenberg, who invented 'Growing Earth' as addition to Wegner's continental drift theory. Both theories are quite similar, but have one main difference: plate tectonics(PT) assumes a constant size of the Earth and growing Earth (called GE here) assumes growth. So, PT needs something balancing the obvious spreading. PT calls this 'subduction'. But 'subduction is blatant nonsense for an large number of reasons. There are several things, which are simply impossible, PT nevertheless assumes. For instance plate movement is impossible in the first place, if the entire Earth is covered with plates (as the Earth is), because plates would need to move (obviously) it plates shall move. That is in fact difficult, because the entire plate is one huge piece of stone and if it would like to float upon the upper mantle, the front part of the plate needs space, towards where it could move. But 'subduction' (even if entirely nonsense itself) assumes only an explanation for a little part of the front, which is right in the middle of the moving direction. But because the plate is internally rigid, the entire length of the front of that plate needs to 'subduct' and not only the part adjacent to a continent. If a plate were a hexagon moving into the direction of on side, then three front sides need space to move towards,not only the one front line. But because plates have a diameter in the range of several thousand kilometers, we would als need several thousand square kilometers of 'space' (actually uncovered view upon the upper mantle), if the plate shall move 1 km. But no such space exists. Actually the entire planet is covered with plates, hence plates have exactly zero opportunity to mover horizontally. (this was only one of a lot of counterarguments against plate tectonics, but there exist several others, too) > Wegner doesn't seem to have suffered any damage because he advanced it - > he was also pretty successful meteorologist > >> The problem: >> >> if you don't deal with issues properly, they sooner or later bite you >> where it hurts. > > If there actually is an issue to be dealt with. You don't seem to be in > close contact with reality. I used GE as counter-example against the so called 'standard modell of QM'. I wanted to use GE as example, that matter is 'relative'. To understand this idea you could read my 'book': https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing This in turn had a huge impact upon almost everything, because physics lays actually the foundations for all other sciences. Therefore, it is very important, that fundamental physics is correct, because all other sciences depend on what physicists had discovered. TH