Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #657968

Re: the notion of counter-intuitiveness in relativistic physics

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: the notion of counter-intuitiveness in relativistic physics
Date Sun, 13 Oct 2024 08:48:50 +0200
Lines 47
Message-ID <ln18qiFhohmU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <GBEGTHyJnMpjHuJ0IoZO0OLSc1M@jntp> <0b2ff7832787b9d3165d93803b09df8f@www.novabbs.com> <74ipUL6JcQu72w-mbGQ7BbVp7kU@jntp> <cda33e42de10aeee9283e500b47a63f9@www.novabbs.com> <AE2L2lzGJn13Z_4dg3bpJC59QsA@jntp> <66b3d79f$0$3656$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <dlVAS4dgp1D4i_LVHm3d5U9hqow@jntp> <43ee5c178f7ae877c0c3e00e77386494@www.novabbs.com> <xHQxwI0qFFk4RXIOP_V9qQEYF6o@jntp> <03be6498d21bfde3edbac3669f10841c@www.novabbs.com> <17ea67a48e5596d2$254537$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <df7a10a82cd895126e0d5ceafa835a8f@www.novabbs.com> <v983k7$mn9k$2@dont-email.me> <a7dae4835f9cfb46e4b870f88745eb14@www.novabbs.com> <17ea6ba7b9983909$254540$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <f9fa957bc38a63d8390864276628add4@www.novabbs.com> <v986og$mn9k$5@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace individual.net +n8QCltk5fxIBCJleHrLSgcWjLEZfSjPd7QD3Lir47brOcC3ag
Cancel-Lock sha1:m1LooN8qDRRviDvAU6S6KoPEbvo= sha256:4N4e8Z/emMQdp8BlweddAxvBOrSGQZXEcD9m6b2mAmk=
User-Agent Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language de-DE
In-Reply-To <v986og$mn9k$5@dont-email.me>
Xref csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:657968

Show key headers only | View raw


Am Samstag000010, 10.08.2024 um 19:07 schrieb Python:
> Le 10/08/2024 à 18:56, gharnagel a écrit :
> ...
>> Wozzie proves once again that he's not an engineer,
>> because engineers would understand when something
>> was engineered.  He's only a greasy monkey.
> 
> Thomas Heger and Maciej Wozniak may have a diploma giving
> them the title of "engineer". Nevertheless it is 100% certain
> that involving them in any engineering task would lead to
> a disaster :-)
> 

Well, no, since my title is from something called 
'Wirtschaftsingenieurswesen'.

That is kind of a mixture from economy and engineering.

It is more related to economy than to what you regard as 'engineering task'.

My main qualification was actually in computers, not in building bridges 
or similar.

But I have a number of other qualifications, too. Most of them are 
selfeducated and more or less hobbies (like e.g. physics).

E.g. I can build and throw bumerangs or solve 'freecell' in under three 
minutes (on average, sometimes under one  minute).

I'm also quite good in photographie and other forms of art.

I can maintain and repair all sorts of vehicles and fully automatic 
coffee-machines.

I have also won a (little) price in math.

I have also a host of skills in the realms related to buildings, ranging 
from electricitian to replace window glass (and almost everything 
inbetween).


TH


TH
> 

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: the notion of counter-intuitiveness in relativistic physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-13 08:48 +0200

csiph-web