Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The purpose of science
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 10:15:13 +0200
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <lev14fFl85bU4@mid.individual.net>
References: <17dea0394e40408e$988$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <66887E6B.397@ix.netcom.com> <les13bF7uhdU2@mid.individual.net> <17df879faf8c6f0a$657$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <les4lkF8eadU2@mid.individual.net> <17df8d2de8223cb2$404$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net W6HMZ9pKkc1M6LrwKP5rYACa8MYiT0EOxkjXGJbe92yz6OQy5S
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HWwDxy0JDJv7ImTE0a2TMyn4dKQ= sha256:aZdWv/uKQ6v9QERHTLT46/LubkoTQrUmqDIVdAp3vSM=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <17df8d2de8223cb2$404$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:654693

Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 08:53 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:

>>>>> if the universe does not have a purpose, why does science thinks it 
>>>>> has
>>>>> a purpose?
>>>>>
>>>> Well, maybe there is a purpose maybe not.
>>>>
>>>> This is a difficult question, but not really for physics.
>>>
>>> For sure, physics is too primitive for serious
>>> subjects.
>>>
>> No, not quite.
> 
> Quite.
>>
>> But how would you, for instance, measure 'purpose'?
> 
> Sometimes it's necessary to use brain and
> think, making measurements can't substitute
> that. Surprise?

well, yes, but your brain is not exactly what I would call 'measuring 
device'.

TH
>