Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Pythagoras, the first major plagiarist of babylonian math, 1000 years before.
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 09:08:12 +0100
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <kr66i6Fca4dU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <b2db9f52-cadc-4961-99db-c05fee9eeaefn@googlegroups.com> <c3ca0c19-fd02-4fbb-9a47-5280d65aa032n@googlegroups.com> <1qj8c9z.14x0olv5al44zN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <kq3kulFb8sgU1@mid.individual.net> <kq3qkbFcbirU1@mid.individual.net> <kq6gq6Fu162U1@mid.individual.net> <uhmb3n$1ajo$1@dont-email.me> <kq9368Fiau5U1@mid.individual.net> <kqe7s4Fm9tkU1@mid.individual.net> <%9p0N.832708$jff3.637437@fx14.ams4> <kqgvhvFbfdgU1@mid.individual.net> <kqh2fkFc75nU1@mid.individual.net> <ui1v5d$2l7f8$3@dont-email.me> <kqjmk2F69mU1@mid.individual.net> <ui35sp$2re9g$1@dont-email.me> <kqknloF60v2U1@mid.individual.net> <kqmap2Ffpn7U1@mid.individual.net> <kqostqF1nihU1@mid.individual.net> <ui8d2d$1tof$1@dont-email.me> <kqrkovFgcrlU1@mid.individual.net> <uibh6d$k15f$1@dont-email.me> <kqu80vFtv9nU1@mid.individual.net> <kqu9p7Fu7l2U1@mid.individual.net> <kr0or5FcmifU2@mid.individual.net> <kr0sl9Fdbc9U1@mid.individual.net> <kr3d50Fqd3vU2@mid.individual.net> <uij7r9$2amkq$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net vjsjxMvis6j3WlcfWnYNnAkLUvVjcA1RkWUBskiBLauneeXfd9
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4kR21rhL0OYilTLdSyKyXf36IqE= sha256:ouxpKHl0FpZRWNnHQdscQab581iOa49SytRiTjB94Rk=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
In-Reply-To: <uij7r9$2amkq$3@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:623894

Am 09.11.2023 um 19:19 schrieb Volney:
> On 11/9/2023 1:42 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>> Am 08.11.2023 um 08:45 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden:
>>> On 2023-11-08 06:43:21 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
>>>
>>>> Am 07.11.2023 um 09:11 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ … ]
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A hand that only you can see. Has anyone else seen it?
>>>>
>>>> Well, possibly you are 'hand-blind'.
>>>
>>> No answer to the question, so I ask again: can you cite anyone else who
>>> has seen your hand?
>>>
>>> I suspect that the answer is no, and that that is why you duck answering
>>> it.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Well, seeing is a quite subjective experience.
>>
>> And my claim was:
>>
>> I can see a blurry female left hand in the lower left corner of this
>> picture:
>>
>> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/Hitler%2C_Maurice%2C_Kriebel%2C_Hess%2C_Weber%2C_prison_de_Landsberg_en_1924.jpg/786px-Hitler%2C_Maurice%2C_Kriebel%2C_Hess%2C_Weber%2C_prison_de_Landsberg_en_1924.jpg
>>
>>
>> This is a personal impression, which you cannot possibly dispute,
>> because you cannot see into my head.
>>
..
I CAN SEE a hand there!!!

You need to look yourself.

The hand has a very strange angle, as if a person (standing 
perpendicular to the picture, hence has a body-axis pointing towards the 
lower left)  would lean on the montage, but a little above on a glass 
plate (that's why it is blurry).

This would be consistent with a really stupid female operator, who made 
a reproduction of a montage, which was very large (table sized) and 
reproduced it with a professional repro system, similar to those used in 
animation studios.


This would be my interpretation of the picture and its origin.

If you don't agree, than please tell me yours.


> (I don't think you are schizophrenic, of course, you just have an
> overactive imagination and leap onto conspiracy theories)


Well, that's actually true to some extent, because I have created dozens 
of 'conspiracy theories'.

Usualy I prefer terms like  'musings about the activities of spooks', 
but 'conspiracy theories' is more often used.

TH