Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: whodat Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:15:12 -0500 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <997b021c-6c9a-4a16-bc83-209e791be734n@googlegroups.com> <77d76dd7-e3bc-4bec-b2a1-a32c4d012840n@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net AnO3dNrGmNkHbLKfNQU/XwKKCSLkWvXPTTozg9pqOfnlXefMfw Cancel-Lock: sha1:ewCT1G1nnvuttkvQ8dEGEbVGsOs= sha256:Lq2wr9iFF0eIXUHlP1gz76IAxeVxO5pe3ZFElRTsarU= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <77d76dd7-e3bc-4bec-b2a1-a32c4d012840n@googlegroups.com> Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:616063 On 7/25/2023 12:20 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: <...> > Time dilation involves using a different length for seconds in one frame than another. Relativity flies in the face of basic physics. Assuming for the sake of argument that's true, what makes the choice of "basic physics" as opposed to "advanced physics or relativity " the right one? Take your time, there's no rush for this answer. Rhetorical, I don't expect any rational answers. That's what happens every time you make a claim that you cannot back up. Onward to ever more ridiculous claims.