Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 09:14:45 +0100 Lines: 84 Message-ID: References: <979026ee-8a51-4932-a09b-6f1f03ab53b8n@googlegroups.com> <6ba51efd-b78b-40bb-904e-4726a6077bc7n@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net KP3jMsmCxytINlUw4vkXdw4ojlyP1xmHKBdHO6cqjfxcdrvMqH Cancel-Lock: sha1:+9YtQl9t4JbS54sIDfKQvfHlyHk= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:595965 Am 21.11.2022 um 03:01 schrieb Volney: >>>> >>>> The other problem was the access to tug-boats in post war Germany (WW >>>> I, of course) and to enough gasoline. >>>> >>>> Sure, a few super-rich could afford everything. But Eva Braun's family >>>> wasn't particularily rich. >>> >>> So once again, all you have are multiple "if.. if.." guesswork, some of >>> which we can see is false. >> >> In this case no, since Eva Braun was working in a photo shop as >> laboratory assistent, what was not a very prestigious job and >> certainly not paid very well. >> >> Motor boats were extremely expensive in those day and most likely not >> available for working class people (like the family Braun). >> >> Germany itself was in disorder on that era, because Germany had just >> recently went through hyperinflation and huge amounts of money were lost. >> >> Prior to hyperinflation they had: the treaty of Versaille, the >> occupation of the Rhein area, revolts of the soldiers, the attempted >> coup of the Nazis and of course WW I (which Germany lost). >> >> There were other issues, too, like: reparations, occupation troups, >> hords of traumatised and injured veterans, massive unemployment, >> massive drug abuse, political turmoil and street fights of rivaling >> gangs of armed ex-soldiers. >> >> That was not quite the era to conduct expensive water sports, >> especially if you were not super-rich. > > So do you have any actual *evidence* it was not Eva Braun who was the > watersports athlete or just more of your paranoid "if.. if.." guesswork? > No, because I'm not a cop and do not investigate a crime scene. I look at films and ask the question, whether the alleged story told by the commentor makes sense. In case of the person called 'Eva Braun' the story didn't make sense for a great variety of reasons. In films you look, if the person behaves according to the context. In case of Eva Braun you look, if the person seen in the films fits to people from the alleged background. In case of Eva Braun this background was a young laboratory assistent in photo-shop in Munich, Bavaria. It is mainly a working class background and nothing prestigious involved. So: does the person look like a Bavarian? Answer: I would say, no, she looked Swedish or so? She behaved particularily strange, when she wore one of these typical Bavarian skirts called 'Dirndl'. Have apprentices in photo-shops usually skills in acrobatics? Answer: no, definitely not, because that profession is mainly inside and in darkness, where athlets usually don't like to work. Had that person any perticular relation with Hitler? Answer: she knew him, but apparently not as close as a girlfriend would be. It was close enough to take her as girlfried, anyhow. But the actually behaviour in close proximity showed, they had no affair with each other. Was that person engaged to any other male? Answer: no, she wasn't. Instead, I had the impression, she was in fact a lesbian. She had close contacts to dogs, children and other weman, but few to males. ... TH