Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: whodat Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Simultaneity of the real world Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 13:42:45 -0500 Lines: 56 Message-ID: References: <70761a2c-4f8f-4f8f-be04-5d5384f1dd27n@googlegroups.com> <99a2zpECP0gEsERVupyieFjdPvE@jntp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net 1lDoNJ8kFx/f/RFtqAMIugSeiW75/BkGJ/TWvO1Fh97uXklGiU Cancel-Lock: sha1:9waxPwUcryEAayZk82rtJK/F2eI= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:582260 On 4/8/2022 12:59 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > whodat wrote: >> On 4/8/2022 7:09 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> whodat wrote: >>>> On 4/7/2022 6:05 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>> whodat wrote: >>>>>> On 4/7/2022 4:38 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>> whodat wrote: >>>>>>>> On 4/7/2022 4:00 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You have attempted to disengage for some time now. I wonder what’s keeping >>>>>>>>> you? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Apparently that's clear to everyone but you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Really? What responses have you gotten from anyone but me that would give >>>>>>> you that impression? >>>>>> >>>>>> How come you're the only one here who doesn't have a clue? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So, no responses at all. >>>> >>>> Gracious, it appears I have (not so) accidentally taken to wrestling >>>> with the proverbial pig. >>>> >>>> Sadly, you still don't have a clue. >>>> >>> >>> Oh but I do. The question really is, am I to play your game? >> >> It has never been my game. > > Depends on what “It” you’re referring to. I was referring to the game you > do in fact play. Your opinion. >>> You see, it’s apparent (at least to me) when you have an unspoken aim in >>> your mode of discussion. The end justifies the means. And if you deem me >>> the pig, it was your decision to wrestle, and it was your decision to step >>> into the sty. >> >> Thanks for acknowledging your place in this realm. It is obvious you >> wish no improvements. That's your choice, your decision. >> > > You apparently missed the conditional in my statement. Notice, please, the > choices YOU made. Also notice the meaning of the adage you referred to. In > the saying about wrestling with pigs, who is the target of that judgment, > the pig or the one who jumps into the sty to wrestle the pig? I see you're requesting an endgame escape maneuver. If so, why not.