Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Athel Cornish-Bowden Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Gravitational Deflection of Light: as per Einstein or as per Newton? Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 11:51:25 +0100 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <855d0537-a3f9-46a1-b812-7d4ff06aad06n@googlegroups.com> <3032606b-e3af-49e0-afe8-860d5093ef56n@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net Z0enVRAtOg/+6L4kposOqg5Jh/e8D+/EEMzsTlcDhi8rmENVU5 Cancel-Lock: sha1:/CwO39s0yc1Ffv1zrJTLVCvxLEA= User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:576899 On 2022-02-12 10:11:53 +0000, Maciej Wozniak said: > On Saturday, 12 February 2022 at 10:47:17 UTC+1, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >> On 2022-02-12 08:50:46 +0000, Pentcho Valev said:>> >> > [ … ] >>> No matter how many frauds you have exposed, you end up buried under> > >>> Einsteinian excreta. Yet sometimes even hopeless battles should be> > >>> fought. >> Maybe, but if you're serious you'll send your analysis for publication> >> in a serious journal.> Writing endless quote-mining posts in a news >> group full of crackpots> won't convince anyone.>> You refer Sabine >> Hossenfelder's blog quite often, but although I follow> her posts >> regularly, her view of Einstein doesn't seem to be the same> as yours. > Well, you're often referring to your idiot guru, Really?!! When, for example? Give some references, please. > but your idiocies > differ from his idiocies. -- Athel -- French and British, living mainly in England until 1987.